From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06B98385B834 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:47:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 06B98385B834 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mliska@suse.cz X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A31AC50; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:47:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] plugin: Don't invoke LTO-wrapper From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= To: "H.J. Lu" , Nick Clifton Cc: Binutils References: <20200319165017.1273885-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> <20200320023832.GK4583@bubble.grove.modra.org> <32d05f6a-8e88-e42b-7d7e-561931c9467f@suse.cz> <29ee5278-23dc-8036-5033-20797a8f0a84@suse.cz> <323306d3-d08b-c965-ddfe-79b5df5bb832@suse.cz> Message-ID: <29e844cf-5634-d5eb-f49e-db55000ede4b@suse.cz> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:47:36 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <323306d3-d08b-c965-ddfe-79b5df5bb832@suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-21.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binutils mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:47:39 -0000 On 3/23/20 4:04 PM, Martin Liška wrote: > On 3/20/20 3:23 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> Hi Nick, >> >> Is that OK to backport these 4 patches to 2.34 branch? > > I would like to postpone it for a while as we're discussing a problem > seen today: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249 > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-March/542497.html Ok, it's fixed now and I would like to ask H.J. to do one more sync of plugin-api.h: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=906b3eb9df6c577d3f6e9c3ea5c9d7e4d1e90536 Martin > > Thanks, > Martin