* Re: elf "note" section for win32-style thread context
1999-07-01 0:00 ` Re[2]: " Egor Duda
@ 1999-07-01 0:00 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Lance Taylor @ 1999-07-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: deo; +Cc: binutils
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 20:36:31 +0400
From: Egor Duda <deo@logos-m.ru>
ILT> The prstatus_t stuff is all ELF specific, so you would have to copy it
ILT> anyhow for the PE-based cygwin code. The current implementation is
ILT> actually not quite right in that it relies on host header files, and
ILT> even if the right header files are available can not be built
ILT> correctly for a cross toolchain.
i'm not sure why? you mean that my changes will make cygwin depend on
bfd?
cygwin already depends upon BFD.
prstatus_t is used in bfd/elf.c, so it is ELF specific. That ELF code
is not used for the cygwin target.
Moreover, the code in bfd/elf.c depends upon having a host header file
which defines the prstatus_t struct. Therefore, it does not work when
the binutils are configured as a cross toolchain.
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re[2]: elf "note" section for win32-style thread context
1999-07-01 0:00 ` Ian Lance Taylor
@ 1999-07-01 0:00 ` Egor Duda
1999-07-01 0:00 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Egor Duda @ 1999-07-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils; +Cc: Ian Lance Taylor
Hi!
May 10 1999 Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com> wrote :
>> I've got an intention to add core dumping functionality to cygwin
>> library, so that cygwin application would write elf core file. As a
>> part of it, there should be "note" sections to store contexts of all
>> running threads. I see two possible ways to do it. I can either
>> emulate through one of existing structures (prstatus_t, lwpstatus_t,
>> etc.) or add new special note type for cygwin to bfd. Which way should
>> i choose?
ILT> The real point of storing thread information in a core file is so that
ILT> you can examine the thread state using gdb. So you should probably
ILT> make your decision based on what fits more naturally into the gdb
ILT> code.
Of course. Actually, I've tried a second way (the simple one) and it
appears that it works perfectly without changing a single line in gdb
sources. The only code i need to add is function in bfd/elf.c to
recognize this particular NT_WIN32CONTEXT note type (yet another
elfcore_grok_ function). But i wasn't sure that simplest solution is a
best one :)
ILT> The prstatus_t stuff is all ELF specific, so you would have to copy it
ILT> anyhow for the PE-based cygwin code. The current implementation is
ILT> actually not quite right in that it relies on host header files, and
ILT> even if the right header files are available can not be built
ILT> correctly for a cross toolchain.
i'm not sure why? you mean that my changes will make cygwin depend on
bfd?
Egor. mailto:deo@logos-m.ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: elf "note" section for win32-style thread context
1999-07-01 0:00 elf "note" section for win32-style thread context Egor Duda
@ 1999-07-01 0:00 ` Ian Lance Taylor
1999-07-01 0:00 ` Re[2]: " Egor Duda
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Lance Taylor @ 1999-07-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: deo; +Cc: binutils
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 18:41:16 +0400
From: Egor Duda <deo@logos-m.ru>
I've got an intention to add core dumping functionality to cygwin
library, so that cygwin application would write elf core file. As a
part of it, there should be "note" sections to store contexts of all
running threads. I see two possible ways to do it. I can either
emulate through one of existing structures (prstatus_t, lwpstatus_t,
etc.) or add new special note type for cygwin to bfd. Which way should
i choose?
The real point of storing thread information in a core file is so that
you can examine the thread state using gdb. So you should probably
make your decision based on what fits more naturally into the gdb
code.
The prstatus_t stuff is all ELF specific, so you would have to copy it
anyhow for the PE-based cygwin code. The current implementation is
actually not quite right in that it relies on host header files, and
even if the right header files are available can not be built
correctly for a cross toolchain.
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* elf "note" section for win32-style thread context
@ 1999-07-01 0:00 Egor Duda
1999-07-01 0:00 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Egor Duda @ 1999-07-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils
Hi!
I've got an intention to add core dumping functionality to cygwin
library, so that cygwin application would write elf core file. As a
part of it, there should be "note" sections to store contexts of all
running threads. I see two possible ways to do it. I can either
emulate through one of existing structures (prstatus_t, lwpstatus_t,
etc.) or add new special note type for cygwin to bfd. Which way should
i choose?
Egor. mailto:deo@logos-m.ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-07-01 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-07-01 0:00 elf "note" section for win32-style thread context Egor Duda
1999-07-01 0:00 ` Ian Lance Taylor
1999-07-01 0:00 ` Re[2]: " Egor Duda
1999-07-01 0:00 ` Ian Lance Taylor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).