From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc@cygnus.com>, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: glibc 2.1 and gabi
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 20:18:00 -0000
Message-id: <397BB57B.4E1B9B35@cygnus.com>
References: <200007201926.MAA01613@elmo.cygnus.com> <20000720124049.A6742@lucon.org>
X-SW-Source: 2000-07/msg00431.html

"H . J . Lu" wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 12:26:57PM -0700, Nick Clifton wrote:
> > : Well, it is kind of misleading since glibc 2.1 does support dynamic
> > : tags. It just doesn't support the unknown tags in certain range.
> > :
> > : --enable-new-dynamic-tags
> > : --no-enable-new-dynamic-tags
> > :
> > : is better.
> >
> > That is OK with me.
> 
> How about just
> 
> --disable-new-dynamic-tags
> --enable-new-dynamic-tags

Um, do you really want to call something ``new''.  Similar to the
comment I just posted to GCC-patches, it will be old soon enough.

	Andrew