* Ping -- RFC Creating corefile sections for gdb
@ 2002-01-03 16:38 Michael Snyder
2002-01-04 3:07 ` Nick Clifton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2002-01-03 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils; +Cc: nickc
Nobody has responded to my request for comment (see link)
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2001-12/msg00477.html
Shall I submit it as-is for approval?
Michael Snyder
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Ping -- RFC Creating corefile sections for gdb
2002-01-03 16:38 Ping -- RFC Creating corefile sections for gdb Michael Snyder
@ 2002-01-04 3:07 ` Nick Clifton
2002-01-04 8:51 ` Michael Snyder
2002-01-07 13:56 ` Michael Snyder
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2002-01-04 3:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Snyder; +Cc: binutils
Hi Michael,
> Nobody has responded to my request for comment (see link)
Sorry - I should have looked at this.
The patch looks OK to me. I wonder how much realloc-ing will go on,
and whether this will be a performance issue, but other than that, it
seems fine.
> Shall I submit it as-is for approval?
Please do.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Ping -- RFC Creating corefile sections for gdb
2002-01-04 3:07 ` Nick Clifton
@ 2002-01-04 8:51 ` Michael Snyder
2002-01-07 13:56 ` Michael Snyder
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2002-01-04 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton; +Cc: Michael Snyder, binutils
Nick Clifton wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> > Nobody has responded to my request for comment (see link)
>
> Sorry - I should have looked at this.
>
> The patch looks OK to me. I wonder how much realloc-ing will go on,
> and whether this will be a performance issue, but other than that, it
> seems fine.
Probably one realloc per call. There should be 2N + 1 calls
for a corefile, where N is the number of threads. Not a lot,
but I'm open to other ways of doing it. The issue is that
the caller does not know how much space is required for the
internal header structures.
>
> > Shall I submit it as-is for approval?
>
> Please do.
>
> Cheers
> Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Ping -- RFC Creating corefile sections for gdb
2002-01-04 3:07 ` Nick Clifton
2002-01-04 8:51 ` Michael Snyder
@ 2002-01-07 13:56 ` Michael Snyder
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2002-01-07 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton; +Cc: binutils
Nick Clifton wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> > Nobody has responded to my request for comment (see link)
>
> Sorry - I should have looked at this.
>
> The patch looks OK to me. I wonder how much realloc-ing will go on,
> and whether this will be a performance issue, but other than that, it
> seems fine.
>
> > Shall I submit it as-is for approval?
>
> Please do.
Ah, I wasn't meant to take this for approval, was I?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-07 21:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-03 16:38 Ping -- RFC Creating corefile sections for gdb Michael Snyder
2002-01-04 3:07 ` Nick Clifton
2002-01-04 8:51 ` Michael Snyder
2002-01-07 13:56 ` Michael Snyder
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).