From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14389 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2007 06:08:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 14377 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Apr 2007 06:08:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (HELO mail-out3.apple.com) (17.254.13.22) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:08:46 +0100 Received: from relay6.apple.com (a17-128-113-36.apple.com [17.128.113.36]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3Q68Ep5009812; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay6.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay6.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id A7483100A4; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:08:14 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807124-a0c9dbb000000872-f8-463041ce4eba Received: from [17.151.66.180] (unknown [17.151.66.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay6.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 51C181008D; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:08:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <79E2C699-C52B-469D-A836-A7BA91E4E275@google.com> References: <27E8A691-807E-4CB5-A7EE-6A3FAC4013A1@google.com> <200704130412.l3D4CbdI024712@localhost.localdomain> <31CDB327-F3DB-4884-95EF-98C247D70A2F@google.com> <79E2C699-C52B-469D-A836-A7BA91E4E275@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <3F248524-3F5F-4CC2-9895-201DC4C96F9A@apple.com> Cc: Andrew Pinski , binutils , GCC Patches , DJ Delorie , Daniel Berlin , Mike Stump , Fariborz Jahanian Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric Christopher Subject: Re: binutils/libiberty patch for c++filt to demangle ObjC++ symbols Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:12:00 -0000 To: Dave MacLachlan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00338.txt.bz2 > > Andrew... > > You are 100% correct. Should I change the option then from ObjC++ > to AppleObjC++ or do we hope that they are going to be changing > their mangling to be C++ compliant? > > Other options? I'd hope the ObjC++ mangling should be C++ compliant. Do you have access to the apple bug reporter (radar) so you can enter it there? (If not, let me know and I'll file it). -eric