From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com>
To: Geoff Keating <geoffk@ozemail.com.au>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: A glibc dynamic linker or gld bug?
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 06:11:00 -0000
Message-id: <4.2.0.58.19990709150547.03c3b710@mail.lauterbach.com>
References: <19990708032728.28186.qmail@daffy.airs.com> <19990704205206.7C71E57B9@ocean.lucon.org> <199907050455.OAA00862@geoffk.wattle.id.au> <19990705204814.A26423@twiddle.net> <19990707021030.28537.qmail@daffy.airs.com> <199907070823.SAA00550@geoffk.wattle.id.au> <19990707182141.2997.qmail@daffy.airs.com> <199907080312.NAA00645@geoffk.wattle.id.au> <199907081418.AAA13596@geoffk.wattle.id.au>
X-SW-Source: 1999-q3/msg00103.html

At 16:18 08.07.99 , Geoff Keating wrote:


>I predict that with this patch, the typical executable will make no
>external weak references at all.  [I can only 'predict' at present
>because the 990706 snapshot is failing too many tests to install.]

Testsuite tests or your personal tests? 990626 checked fine for me on PPC, 
except one test of ld-shared, but this seems to be a bug in the dynamic linker.

In any case I'll try current cvs now again.

Franz.