From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15971 invoked by alias); 3 May 2004 22:37:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15929 invoked from network); 3 May 2004 22:37:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 May 2004 22:37:35 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i43MbZkI027988; Mon, 3 May 2004 18:37:35 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (to-dhcp51.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.151]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i43MbYv19829; Mon, 3 May 2004 18:37:34 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A3F2B9D; Mon, 3 May 2004 18:37:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4096C9AE.9040504@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 22:37:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: DJ Delorie Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Add host's floatformat References: <40939DD4.3000706@gnu.org> <4093DC36.9040304@gnu.org> <200405020312.i423CSlH008732@greed.delorie.com> <4096996E.9080700@gnu.org> <200405032210.i43MArI1021688@greed.delorie.com> In-Reply-To: <200405032210.i43MArI1021688@greed.delorie.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2 >>Like this? I feel ill. > > > One problem with your approach is that "1.0" may not be a suitable > pattern to match for every FPU. I left the test constant in the > structure because some FPUs may need more esoteric patterns to > differentiate themselves from other FPUs. Hence the comment about > keeping them in order, too. Er, this pattern matching idea is your approach, not mine. I'd rather just stick with configure.ac. If there really is a problem such as you describe then surely the person that encounters that problem gets to fix it. Andrew