From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12349 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2005 17:50:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12291 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2005 17:50:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.oarcorp.com) (216.107.91.226) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2005 17:50:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 25447 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2005 17:50:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO OARcorp.com) (192.168.1.2) by mail.oarcorp.com with SMTP; 24 Feb 2005 17:50:09 -0000 Message-ID: <421E13B4.7080100@OARcorp.com> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:09:00 -0000 From: "Joel Sherrill " Reply-To: joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com Organization: OAR Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: Hans-Peter Nilsson , binutils@sources.redhat.com, Eric Norum Subject: Re: Q: Estimated date for 2.16 release ? References: <20050127140010.GA447@nevyn.them.org> <41F8F9D3.3080502@OARcorp.com> <20050224174631.GE5216@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20050224174631.GE5216@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00608.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 09:36:11AM -0500, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > >>On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >>>http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-03/msg00489.html >>> >>>Eric Norum (cc'ed) recently narrowed it down to this construct: >>> >>>============================================================= >>>A little poking around reveals that it's the lines like: >>> >>>_RamBase = DEFINED(_RamBase) ? _RamBase : 0x0; >>>_RamSize = DEFINED(_RamSize) ? _RamSize : 0x7f0000; >>>_HeapSize = DEFINED(_HeapSize) ? _HeapSize : 0; /* 0x20000;*/ >>>_StackSize = DEFINED(_StackSize) ? _StackSize : 1M; /* 0x2000;*/ >>> >>>that are killing ld. >>>============================================================== >>> >>>Does this sound familiar? >> >>Yes. :-( The semantics of DEFINED has changed. IIRC, my patch >>to announce that in ld/NEWS before 2.15 received no comments. >>The usage above should still work, though. >> >>Can you open a PR with binutils-self-contained (only assembly >>files, no C or objects) test-case? Maybe all was at the URL >>above, but I don't see the ld command line. Still, please open >>a PR. > > > Was a PR ever created for this? Has anyone looked at it? Not that I know of. Eric.. if you have a .c file and simple linkcmds that produces this, then just use the -S option to put together a binutils test case. Thanks. --joel