From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2351 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2005 11:35:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2244 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2005 11:35:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2005 11:35:38 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j21BZcdR001416 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 06:35:38 -0500 Received: from pobox.surrey.redhat.com (pobox.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.10.17]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j21BZZK10852; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 06:35:35 -0500 Received: from [172.31.0.98] (vpnuser1.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.9.1]) by pobox.surrey.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j21BZVZc000424; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:35:34 GMT Message-ID: <42245638.3020109@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:35:00 -0000 From: Nick Clifton User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Aaron W. LaFramboise" CC: Danny Smith , binutils Subject: Re: Build fails in makeinfo References: <42210FA2.2030705@aaronwl.com> <000501c51c69$c7ba5b30$724861cb@DANNY> <42213A85.1040601@aaronwl.com> In-Reply-To: <42213A85.1040601@aaronwl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 Hi Aaron, > It seems that the real trouble is in my makeinfo, not in chew. makeinfo should be > able to accomidate Windows line endings when it is built on Windows. Well ideally it should cope with them anywhere, not just when built on Windows. > I'm a little curious why I am suddenly having this problem now, when I > didn't have it before. Have you changed something about your build environment ? Are you using a networked drive or a different file system ? I assume for now though that you are not asking for Danny's patch to be applied to the sources ? Cheers Nick