From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24644 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2005 23:02:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24577 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2005 23:02:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.9) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2005 23:02:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 10957 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2005 23:02:47 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (mitchell@127.0.0.1) by mail.codesourcery.com with SMTP; 1 Mar 2005 23:02:47 -0000 Message-ID: <4224F48B.6000804@codesourcery.com> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 23:02:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Stump CC: Paolo Bonzini , GCC Patches , binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, DJ Delorie Subject: Re: PR/17383: fix gcc in-srcdir build (take 2) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2 Mike Stump wrote: > On Saturday, February 26, 2005, at 03:46 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> The attached patch creates the host-subdir only if gcc is found in the >> tree. > > > It feels like progress to me... I find it more annoying that this is > broken, then any particular solution to the problem, therefore I support > it. I was perhaps the original proponent of this approach, and I'm still in favor. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC mark@codesourcery.com (916) 791-8304