From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27451 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2005 09:03:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27353 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2005 09:03:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2005 09:03:48 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2B93m8x016737 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 04:03:48 -0500 Received: from pobox.surrey.redhat.com (pobox.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.10.17]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j2B93gn23229; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 04:03:43 -0500 Received: from [172.31.0.98] (vpnuser4.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.9.4]) by pobox.surrey.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j2B93fpa026575; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:03:42 GMT Message-ID: <423161CC.3060608@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:03:00 -0000 From: Nick Clifton User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans-Peter Nilsson CC: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Fix for unexpected failure in ld-cris/warn3 References: <4224A6A8.5010706@redhat.com> <422DC0F5.6060703@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00323.txt.bz2 Hi Hans-Peter, >> I am using the GNUPro version that >>RedHat ships to various paying customers which is based on gcc 3.4 >>rather than the gcc 3.2.3 version which is the system default for RHEL3. >> Unfortunately I tried reverting to the system compiler and the failure >>still happened. > Sorry, but are you *sure* that the other compiler was actually > used? Well no, not 100%. But I have just cleared out my ccache, removed all other compilers from my search path and rebuild a cris-elf toolchain from scratch and the failure still happens. :-( I am not going to worry about it though. If you are happy with the test results then I am not going to fuss about one small, hard to reproduce failure. Cheers Nick