From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15803 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2005 09:27:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15742 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2005 09:27:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2005 09:27:18 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2O9RIQ1001157 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 04:27:18 -0500 Received: from pobox.surrey.redhat.com (pobox.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.10.17]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j2O9RCO07755; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 04:27:12 -0500 Received: from [172.31.0.98] (vpnuser4.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.9.4]) by pobox.surrey.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j2O9QxpS021677; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:26:59 GMT Message-ID: <42428AF9.7040101@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:58:00 -0000 From: Nick Clifton User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James E Wilson CC: Alan Modra , Andreas Schwab , Ben Elliston , binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: build failure for ia64 (due to -Werror) References: <423A2ADB.6090807@au.ibm.com> <423ABA6A.4030409@redhat.com> <20050318122113.GY21148@bubble.modra.org> <1111177693.9897.18.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com> <20050318234920.GE21148@bubble.modra.org> <1111552545.18829.96.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com> <4241421C.1080502@redhat.com> <1111607109.7939.1.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com> In-Reply-To: <1111607109.7939.1.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00732.txt.bz2 Hi Jim, >>I am happy to do that, but presumably the elf32-ia64.lo entry should be >>moved from BFD32_BACKENDS to BFD64_BACKENDS ? > That is what the proposed patch attached to my last message does. Sorry - I missed that. I have now checked your patch in. Cheers Nick