* Supposedly unsupported targets
@ 2005-03-26 2:05 Steve Underwood
2005-03-26 14:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steve Underwood @ 2005-03-26 2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils
Hi,
On 22nd March a message was posted proposing support for a number of
targets in binutils be deprecated. The MSP430 was included as an
unmaintained target. I am puzzled by this. It is very actively
maintained. Updates for this MSP430 went into binutils not too long ago.
I have another bunch of updates we are getting ready to submit for new
parts in the MSP430 family.
Can someone tell me what criteria have been used to draw up the list?
Has the MSP430 been included by mistake?
Regards,
Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Supposedly unsupported targets
2005-03-26 2:05 Supposedly unsupported targets Steve Underwood
@ 2005-03-26 14:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-26 14:38 ` Dmitry
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2005-03-26 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steve Underwood; +Cc: binutils, Dmitry
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 12:40:41AM +0800, Steve Underwood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22nd March a message was posted proposing support for a number of
> targets in binutils be deprecated. The MSP430 was included as an
> unmaintained target. I am puzzled by this. It is very actively
> maintained. Updates for this MSP430 went into binutils not too long ago.
> I have another bunch of updates we are getting ready to submit for new
> parts in the MSP430 family.
>
> Can someone tell me what criteria have been used to draw up the list?
> Has the MSP430 been included by mistake?
Alan wrote:
Some of the targets I put in the dead/maintainerless list are fairly
new. I put them on the list simply because the original contributor
didn't put their name in binutils/MAINTAINERS. Please fix..
Please see:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-03/msg00704.html
Dmitry, do you have commit access? If so, could you commit the patch?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Supposedly unsupported targets
2005-03-26 14:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2005-03-26 14:38 ` Dmitry
2005-03-26 14:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry @ 2005-03-26 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: Steve Underwood, binutils
Hi Daniel,
> Dmitry, do you have commit access? If so, could you commit the patch?
Yes, I have applied the patch to binutils/MAINTAINERS yesterday.
Cheers,
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Supposedly unsupported targets
2005-03-26 14:38 ` Dmitry
@ 2005-03-26 14:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2005-03-26 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry; +Cc: Steve Underwood, binutils
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 08:45:07PM +0000, Dmitry wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> > Dmitry, do you have commit access? If so, could you commit the patch?
>
> Yes, I have applied the patch to binutils/MAINTAINERS yesterday.
Ah, thank you. My tree was out of date.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-25 18:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-26 2:05 Supposedly unsupported targets Steve Underwood
2005-03-26 14:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-26 14:38 ` Dmitry
2005-03-26 14:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).