From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16130 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2005 16:45:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16098 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2005 16:45:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO main.coppice.org) (202.76.92.172) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2005 16:45:17 -0000 Received: from [192.168.2.50] ([192.168.2.50]) (authenticated bits=0) by main.coppice.org (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j2PGefl5003755 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:42 +0800 Message-ID: <42443F09.3080202@coppice.org> Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:05:00 -0000 From: Steve Underwood User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Supposedly unsupported targets Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00780.txt.bz2 Hi, On 22nd March a message was posted proposing support for a number of targets in binutils be deprecated. The MSP430 was included as an unmaintained target. I am puzzled by this. It is very actively maintained. Updates for this MSP430 went into binutils not too long ago. I have another bunch of updates we are getting ready to submit for new parts in the MSP430 family. Can someone tell me what criteria have been used to draw up the list? Has the MSP430 been included by mistake? Regards, Steve