Hi,

Peter S. Mazinger schrieb:

>>I'm not sure *-*-linux-uclibc would be the right choice, as it suggests
>>running Linux with uclibc as your C library, which is something the
>>binutils need not care about. I could, however, see a case for
>>*-*-uclinux due to the ABI differences and the need for relocation
>>information in fully linked executables.

> Maybe for binutils it does not make sense, but for gcc (libstdc++)
> it will be needed.

I think it may be much better to teach gcc how to switch its standard
libraries easily, possibly removing the fixincludes step from the
all-host target as a working gcc without system includes may be required
to bring the C library into a state where it can install its headers.

    Simon