From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14177 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2005 17:38:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14034 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2005 17:37:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2005 17:37:53 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2THbrth031020 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:37:53 -0500 Received: from pobox.surrey.redhat.com (pobox.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.10.17]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j2THbqO06780; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:37:52 -0500 Received: from [172.31.0.98] (vpnuser2.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.9.2]) by pobox.surrey.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j2THbopS003921; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:37:51 +0100 Message-ID: <424991BE.1030206@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:00:00 -0000 From: Nick Clifton User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kkk85@singnet.com.sg CC: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Error compiling binutils on solaris 10X86 References: <1112006374.4247dee6ae82b@dory.singnet.com.sg> In-Reply-To: <1112006374.4247dee6ae82b@dory.singnet.com.sg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00880.txt.bz2 Hi Kee Kiat, > I tried installing binutils 2.15 on solaris 10 X86. I took the following steps: - > > 1. ./configure > 2. make > > perl ./../etc/texi2pod.pl -Dman < ./ld.texinfo > ld.pod > (pod2man --center="GNU Development Tools" --release="binutils-2.15" --section=1 ld.pod | \ > sh: pod2man: not found > Any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance. pod2man is usually installed into /usr/bin. It is part of the perl package. Perhaps perl was only partially installed on your system ? Suggested workaround: compile with "make -k". Cheers Nick