Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 17:34, Julian Brown wrote:
>>Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>>This function isn't elf specific, which is one of the reasons I
>>>suggested moving it to cpu-arm.c.  So why have you put elf32 in the
>>>name?
>>
>>Doh, sorry. I was confused by the mapping symbols being defined by the 
>>AAELF spec, and didn't realise they would be used elsewhere too.
> 
> True, but we don't define a coff spec.  However, I suspect that if we
> did, we'd probably put mapping symbols in there too.

OK, here is a further patch to rename the function.

ChangeLog:

bfd:
   * bfd-in.h (bfd_is_arm_mapping_symbol_name): Rename from
   bfd_elf32_is_arm_mapping_symbol_name.
   * bfd-in2.h: Regenerate.
   * cpu-arm.c (bfd_is_arm_mapping_symbol_name): Rename from
   bfd_elf32_is_arm_mapping_symbol_name.
   * elf32-arm.c (elf32_arm_is_target_special_symbol): Rename
   bfd_elf32_is_arm_mapping_symbol_name to bfd_is_arm_mapping_symbol_name.
   (arm_elf_find_function): Likewise.
   (elf32_arm_output_symbol_hook): Likewise.

gas:
   * config/tc-arm.c (arm_adjust_symtab): Rename
   bfd_elf32_is_arm_mapping_symbol_name to bfd_is_arm_mapping_symbol_name.