From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14323 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2005 23:24:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14189 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2005 23:23:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cs20.apochromatic.org) (204.152.189.161) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 30 Mar 2005 23:23:55 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.24] (c-24-7-112-29.client.comcast.net [24.7.112.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cs20.apochromatic.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28253ADB72; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:23:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <424B3531.7050907@3am-software.com> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:26:00 -0000 From: Matt Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan-Benedict Glaw CC: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: VAX: ELF regression References: <20050330151658.A4838@microdata-pos.de> In-Reply-To: <20050330151658.A4838@microdata-pos.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00913.txt.bz2 Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > Hi! > > (This is cross-posted to two lists. Please reply to the > binutils list *only*. Thanks.) > > On Sep 27, 2002, there was a gas test added for VAX, which fails on > NetBSD these days. I've also built a binutils snapshot of Sep 30, > but that also fails. This test isn't strictly vax-netbsdelf specific, > but should also run for vax-linux (patch will follow the other day). > Could somebody review it? It looks like -k wasn't passed to gas. Only in that case will be PC32 be emitted as PLT32 or GOT32. -- Matt Thomas email: matt@3am-software.com 3am Software Foundry www: http://3am-software.com/bio/matt/ Cupertino, CA disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message.