From: Dmitriy Nikitinskiy <nick@bel.ru>
To: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: LD improvements on PE (mingw)
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <429D96DA.6060107@bel.ru> (raw)
Hi All!
I have strange situation on linking for PE under win32 and linux.
When I run link under win32, they work about 8 min and uses more than
200 Mb RAM.
When I run link same project under linux using cross-compilled mingw,
I give 1.5 min link time and 60 Mb used RAM.
Why equal versions (GNU ld version 2.13.90 20030111) of binutils give
too different results?
Object files are build from C++ with using lots of templates.
Does any body works at this time to improve performance of linking for
PE under win32?
I have big interest to improve ld for win32, and can help in patching
ld or bfd.
Regrads,
Dmitriy.
next reply other threads:[~2005-06-01 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-01 11:05 Dmitriy Nikitinskiy [this message]
2005-06-01 14:21 ` Aaron W. LaFramboise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=429D96DA.6060107@bel.ru \
--to=nick@bel.ru \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).