From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31095 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2005 11:05:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31037 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jun 2005 11:04:58 -0000 Received: from mx.senergy.ru (HELO mail.senergy.ru) (213.59.156.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:04:58 +0000 Received: from [192.168.168.165] (applab.senergy.ru [81.28.9.2] (may be forged)) by mail.senergy.ru (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j51B4n0D033594 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:04:49 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from nick@bel.ru) Message-ID: <429D96DA.6060107@bel.ru> Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:05:00 -0000 From: Dmitriy Nikitinskiy User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: LD improvements on PE (mingw) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 Hi All! I have strange situation on linking for PE under win32 and linux. When I run link under win32, they work about 8 min and uses more than 200 Mb RAM. When I run link same project under linux using cross-compilled mingw, I give 1.5 min link time and 60 Mb used RAM. Why equal versions (GNU ld version 2.13.90 20030111) of binutils give too different results? Object files are build from C++ with using lots of templates. Does any body works at this time to improve performance of linking for PE under win32? I have big interest to improve ld for win32, and can help in patching ld or bfd. Regrads, Dmitriy.