From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21149 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2006 03:06:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 21140 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2006 03:06:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from crgw.crossroads.com (HELO crgw.crossroads.com) (72.165.173.93) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:06:23 +0000 Received: from email.crossroads.com ([192.168.1.235]) by crgw.crossroads.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 14 Jun 2006 22:06:16 -0500 X-MessageTextProcessor: DisclaimIt (2.60.260) [Crossroads Systems, Inc] Received: from mailnode1.COMMSTOR.Crossroads.com ([192.168.120.20]) by email.crossroads.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 14 Jun 2006 22:05:09 -0500 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Excessive link time with 2.16.1 Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 05:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <43F5E8AE07F17C47BC16F7A159E9E700C23F04@mailnode1.commstor.crossroads.com> From: "David M. Lee" To: "H. J. Lu" Cc: Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00234.txt.bz2 Interesting. Here are the link times for the example mentioned in PR2342 and my applicat= ion for various binutils. The patch helped a lot, but it's not the only pr= oblem. | 2.15.94.0.2.2 | 2.16.1 | 2.16.1 +PR2342 patch -------+---------------+---------+--------------------- slowld | 4m 17s | 4m 16s | 15s myapp | 11s | 13m 03s | 1m 07s So the patch definitely fixes the problem the 'slowld' example had, and add= resses most of the problem with myapp. I'll try and run with a profiler to see if I can figure out where all the t= ime is being spent. BTW: in order to apply http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-04/msg00329.h= tml, I had to apply http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elflin= k.c.diff?r1=3D1.143&r2=3D1.144&cvsroot=3Dsrc first. dave <>< -----Original Message----- From: H. J. Lu [mailto:hjl@lucon.org]=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 1:58 PM To: David M. Lee Cc: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Excessive link time with 2.16.1 On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:09:57PM -0500, David M. Lee wrote: > Unfortunately, no. >=20 I was wondering if it was the same as http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D2342#c9 H.J. CONFIDENTIAL: This email, including its contents and attachments, if any, a= re confidential. If the reader of this e-mail is not an intended recipient,= you have received this e-mail in error and any review, dissemination, dist= ribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mai= l in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail at [email= address@crossroads.com] and permanently delete the copy you received. Copyr= ight and other intellectual property rights in its contents are the sole pr= operty of Crossroads Systems, Inc. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed = to be secure or error-free. The sender therefore does not accept liability = for any errors or omissions in the contents of the message which arise as a= result of email transmission. Although we routinely screen for viruses, = addressees should check this email and any attachments for viruses. We make= no representation or warranty as to the absence of viruses in this email o= r any attachments.