From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24451 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2006 10:37:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 24442 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Apr 2006 10:37:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from province.act-europe.fr (HELO province.act-europe.fr) (212.157.227.214) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:37:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-province.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876CC4ACE4; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:37:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from province.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (province.act-europe.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52375-01; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:37:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.0.218] (madrid.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by province.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421824ACC6; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:37:24 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4451F067.4090401@adacore.com> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:10:00 -0000 From: Nicolas Roche User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050715) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Modra CC: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Performance issues with -ffunction-sections and dwarf2 debug line info References: <444F4B7E.7080806@adacore.com> <20060428040629.GA11666@bubble.grove.modra.org> In-Reply-To: <20060428040629.GA11666@bubble.grove.modra.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00408.txt.bz2 Alan Modra wrote: > > Thanks for the analysis and patch. It looks OK to me as all places that > traverse the list don't care too much about the order. I'm going to > apply the following slightly different patch instead, so we don't need > another static var and to make line_seg and line_subseg list addition > look similar. Thanks for your review (I just see that I forgot to provide a Changelog entry ... will do next time). Just a little question. Will you apply that patch on the 2.17 branch as well so that this fix is included in the upcoming 2.17 release ? Nicolas Roche