From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-45726-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10891 invoked by alias); 2 May 2006 15:34:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 10871 invoked by uid 22791); 2 May 2006 15:34:13 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 May 2006 15:34:07 +0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) 	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k42FY49J023765; 	Tue, 2 May 2006 11:34:04 -0400
Received: from pobox.surrey.redhat.com (pobox.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.10.17]) 	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k42FY3Cg008882; 	Tue, 2 May 2006 11:34:03 -0400
Received: from [10.32.68.10] (vpn-68-10.surrey.redhat.com [10.32.68.10]) 	by pobox.surrey.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k42FY2Uo017567; 	Tue, 2 May 2006 16:34:03 +0100
Message-ID: <44577BEA.9090800@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 15:34:00 -0000
From: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Korn <dave.korn@artimi.com>
CC: binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in two binutils testsuite test names.
References: <020701c66dee$8c4b7fc0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
In-Reply-To: <020701c66dee$8c4b7fc0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2

Hi Dave,

> seem to be a lot of minor nits and cleanups going in, I noticed that 'setting'
> was mis-speeeled.  Does anyone use these names for automated analysis, or
> shall we correct it?

Yes please.

>   Tested by running the testsuite and seeing that it doesn't go wrong and that
> the right text ends up in the sum and log files!
> 
> 
> 2006-05-02  Dave Korn  <dave.korn@artimi.com>
> 
> 	* binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-1.d (name):  Correct spelling
> 	of 'setting'.
> 	* binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/copy-1.d (name):  Likewise.

Approved - please apply.

Cheers
   Nick