From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-45887-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3109 invoked by alias); 11 May 2006 08:51:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 3076 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2006 08:51:04 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:51:02 +0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) 	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4B8ojKt009228; 	Thu, 11 May 2006 04:50:45 -0400
Received: from pobox.surrey.redhat.com (pobox.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.10.17]) 	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4B8oivQ009369; 	Thu, 11 May 2006 04:50:45 -0400
Received: from [10.32.68.2] (vpn-68-2.surrey.redhat.com [10.32.68.2]) 	by pobox.surrey.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4B8oghq006210; 	Thu, 11 May 2006 09:50:44 +0100
Message-ID: <4462FAD8.7010700@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:54:00 -0000
From: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
CC: binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Binutils on arm : pls advice me how to proceed
References: <1146765307.4177.16.camel@dannypc> <20060504180348.GA5785@nevyn.them.org> <445A4FF9.2020903@portugalmail.pt> <4461C504.6050208@redhat.com> <44627BF4.1080608@portugalmail.pt>
In-Reply-To: <44627BF4.1080608@portugalmail.pt>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00213.txt.bz2

Hi Pedro,

> Made a small test:
> Three objects (from main.cpp main2.cpp main3.cpp), one function each, 
> each calls the other in chain, and both all -lc functions (printf).
> 
> Linked with:
> 
> ${OUTFILE}.exe : $(OBJECTS) Makefile
>    $(CXX) -v main.o main2.o -nostdlib -r -o partial.o
>    $(CXX) -v partial.o main3.o -static $(LDFLAGS) -o ${OUTFILE}.exe
> 
> Tested with runtime as dll and with -static.
> And it ran ok.

Excellent - thanks for doing that.

I have now checked in your patches to the mainline sources.

Cheers
   Nick