From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28621 invoked by alias); 19 May 2006 09:03:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 28545 invoked by uid 22791); 19 May 2006 09:03:04 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 May 2006 09:03:01 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4J92vVM019121; Fri, 19 May 2006 05:02:57 -0400 Received: from pobox.surrey.redhat.com (pobox.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.10.17]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4J92vsr004245; Fri, 19 May 2006 05:02:57 -0400 Received: from [10.32.68.4] (vpn-68-4.surrey.redhat.com [10.32.68.4]) by pobox.surrey.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4J92ui4004990; Fri, 19 May 2006 10:02:56 +0100 Message-ID: <446D89BF.10608@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 12:35:00 -0000 From: Nick Clifton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mauricio Alvarez CC: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: problems with gas in AIX 5.2 References: <4464BD35.2030006@ac.upc.edu> <44685480.6060505@redhat.com> <4468622C.8050307@ac.upc.edu> In-Reply-To: <4468622C.8050307@ac.upc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00326.txt.bz2 Hi Mauricio, > But, I want to use binutils because I want to do some modifications in > the assembler. Do you mean that you want to edit the assembler output of the compiler by hand, before passing it on to the assembler itself, or do you mean that you want the assembler to perform some changes to the code as it converts it into an object file ? > So, I have to build gcc with the native assembler and to > assemble my applications with the GNU assembler using the mentioned scheme: I assume that you are using the most recent sources for the assembler, correct ? > Then, my original question is: is this a known problem of binutils in > AIX-5.X, and if there is a patch or some compile/assembly options that > can overcome or avoid this problem. Unfortunately I am not familiar with the AIX port of the assembler, so I cannot tell you if it is a known problem. Perhaps if you can put together a small test case that demonstrates the problem, someone can look at it. Cheers Nick