From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-46531-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 2967 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2006 15:06:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 2958 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jun 2006 15:06:05 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 15:06:02 +0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) 	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5MF5rRv029398; 	Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:05:53 -0400
Received: from pobox.surrey.redhat.com (pobox.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.10.17]) 	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5MF5q1a000820; 	Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:05:53 -0400
Received: from [10.32.68.2] (vpn-68-2.surrey.redhat.com [10.32.68.2]) 	by pobox.surrey.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5MF5pbB015197; 	Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:05:51 +0100
Message-ID: <449AB1C8.1070302@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 15:39:00 -0000
From: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yvan Castilloux <kayoux@hotmail.com>
CC: binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: relocatable link problem
References: <BAY103-F130C7F314159075130F0FCDE820@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BAY103-F130C7F314159075130F0FCDE820@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00340.txt.bz2

Hi Yvan,

> The problems, for now, comes with pre-linking our code. There are some 
> functions that are called in our code but defined in the user's code. I 
> then decided to declare these functions as extern, otherwise there's an 
> undefined error. Then I added the -r option in the linkage. The command 
> was as follows:
> 
> msp430-gcc -mmcu=${CPU} -r -olibdevice.a -Tldscript1612.x -L$(LIBDIR) 
> $(DEVICE_OBJS) -ldevice

I suspect that the problem here is that the "-r" switch is not being 
interpreted by the msp430-gcc program as a switch for the linker.  Try 
using "-Wl,-r" instead.

Cheers
   Nick