From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11376 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2006 09:22:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 11336 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2006 09:22:24 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 09:22:20 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k679MHc5029167; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 05:22:17 -0400 Received: from pobox.surrey.redhat.com (pobox.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.10.17]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k679MFqc022311; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 05:22:15 -0400 Received: from [10.32.68.5] (vpn-68-5.surrey.redhat.com [10.32.68.5]) by pobox.surrey.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k679MEO7011802; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 10:22:14 +0100 Message-ID: <44AE27C5.6030302@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 09:22:00 -0000 From: Nick Clifton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Frysinger CC: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: make check failures with binutils-2.17 References: <200607031717.52358.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200607031717.52358.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2 Hi Mike, > cross compile targets that failed: > alpha-linux-gnu > armeb-linux-gnu > avr Do you mean "avr-elf" here ? > hppa-linux-gnu > hppa64-linux-gnu > mips64-linux-gnu > mips64el-linux-gnu Do all these targets fail in the same way ? Were you able to build other targets that do not fail the make check ? Anyway to answer your question, I do not have access to a ppc machine, but I do have an amd64 machine (running a 64-bit OS) and on that machine I get these results: The alpha-linux-gnu toolchain fails the LD check with: FAIL: TLS -fpic -shared FAIL: TLS -fpic and -fno-pic exec FAIL: TLS -fpic and -fno-pic exec -relax FAIL: ld-elf/64ksec The armeb-linux-gnu toolchain fails the GAS check with: FAIL: Unwind table generation The avr-elf toolchain fails the GAS check with: FAIL: lns-common-1 The hppa-linux-gnu and hppa64-linux-gnu toolchains fail the GAS check with: XPASS: Check min/max values for .block The mips64-linux-gnu and mips64el-linux-gnu toolchains fail the LD check with: FAIL: ld-elf/orphan2 FAIL: ld-mips-elf/reloc-1-n64 FAIL: MIPS eh-frame 1, n32 FAIL: MIPS eh-frame 1, n64 FAIL: MIPS eh-frame 2, n32 FAIL: MIPS eh-frame 2, n64 Does this match your own findings ? Cheers Nick