From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14698 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2011 07:46:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 14684 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Apr 2011 07:46:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from apochromatic.org (HELO panix.3am-software.com) (166.84.6.62) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:45:02 +0000 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by panix.3am-software.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3CE2785F8 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 03:45:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Thomas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: MIPS64 XLR support patch? Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:46:00 -0000 Message-Id: <4555C99F-0DAD-4934-908E-BDD9001A295F@3am-software.com> To: binutils Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00208.txt.bz2 Given that the changes in http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-01/msg00383.html don't seem to be in binutils, was there any reason why it wasn't picked up? Any reason why they can't be merged now? I'd rather not have these changes be a local modification to the NetBSD's repository copy of binutils but will do so if needed. BTW, the patch applies cleanly (no rejects) to 2.19.1 ...