From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-sender-0.a4lg.com (mail-sender.a4lg.com [153.120.152.154]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD47938582B2 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 07:59:35 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org BD47938582B2 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=irq.a4lg.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=irq.a4lg.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail-sender-0.a4lg.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24FDA300089; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 07:59:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=irq.a4lg.com; s=2017s01; t=1666598374; bh=JoJLMHCjXqzzcOTcW/q2Z6MYAxlC5uEb5NadEr0wRE0=; h=Message-ID:Date:Mime-Version:Subject:To:References:Cc:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=mZpXkvOWcu9qv3YE7tmHJjVrDIM8t7VoRyXrM7zf1wALvQbTYfYopKrNIEAyNn9c2 odLBRgmDy7vrP5Ynke7jRetxwkU7RdtQHeu2CeUnmbPOw9FaDkcKNOjmXJZNyxkWCE czHsIPg/YYMX67X4Cd7l632AkDqGDzsYNHdsZgLA= Message-ID: <467d1cf3-daa4-0c8b-bf04-2d99ddc9c9b3@irq.a4lg.com> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:59:32 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/40] sim+gdb: Suppress warnings if built with Clang (big batch 1) Content-Language: en-US To: binutils@sourceware.org, Mike Frysinger References: Cc: Andrew Burgess From: Tsukasa OI In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 2022/10/23 4:01, Mike Frysinger wrote: > this patch series is for gdb & sim, but you've sent it to the binutils group. > gdb & sim patches should be sent to the gdb-patches@ mailing list instead. > -mike My mistake. I noticed while "git send-email" command sent PATCH 17/40 and I stopped the process immediately (and reposted whole patchset to gdb-patches). Not only that, this patchset should have been [RFC PATCH], not [PATCH] (because it was a mere copy of my working branch, to share/sync with other developers, especially Andrew). I'll respond your reviews in gdb-patches separately. Thanks, Tsukasa