From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1305 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2007 13:49:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 787 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Aug 2007 13:49:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:49:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l7KDnEiP019447; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:49:14 -0400 Received: from pobox.fab.redhat.com (pobox.fab.redhat.com [10.33.63.12]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l7KDnEEC009192; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:49:14 -0400 Received: from [10.33.6.2] (vpn-6-2.fab.redhat.com [10.33.6.2]) by pobox.fab.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l7KDnDPY032005; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:49:13 -0400 Message-ID: <46C99BD2.9020901@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:51:00 -0000 From: Nick Clifton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070301) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Pinski CC: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: Bogus gimplification type mismatch error ? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00310.txt.bz2 Hi Andrew, > As mentioned before this error message is really an internal error, we > really should be fixing GCC and not changing binutils. And I already > mentioned this is most likely PR 22371 and that you should be filing > bug reports about these two errors/ICEs. I have filed PR 33122 to cover this problem and added a comment to PR 22371 mentioning that 33122 might be a duplicate. Cheers Nick