From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27722 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2007 08:50:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 27714 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Nov 2007 08:50:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 08:50:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lAH8oYJ3020995; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 03:50:34 -0500 Received: from pobox.fab.redhat.com (pobox.fab.redhat.com [10.33.63.12]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lAH8oXxS006421; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 03:50:34 -0500 Received: from [10.32.4.27] (vpn-4-27.str.redhat.com [10.32.4.27]) by pobox.fab.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lAH8oWM4003274; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 03:50:33 -0500 Message-ID: <473EAB57.3040808@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 08:50:00 -0000 From: Nick Clifton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20071018) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Wilson CC: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix DWARF for ia64 References: <473A01B5.30907@tensilica.com> <473A1B4E.8030504@tensilica.com> <473D803C.1050700@redhat.com> <473DF39E.2000403@tensilica.com> In-Reply-To: <473DF39E.2000403@tensilica.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00193.txt.bz2 Hi Bob, >> Why are you deleting the update of current.flags ? > > It isn't deleted, just moved into the dwarf2_consume_line_info function. Oops, I missed that. OK the patch is approved - please apply. > It definitely not related to my change. I have again verified that it > happens without any of my changes. I suspect you're using a 64-bit > host, I am. > since the problem appears to be related to 32-bit hosts. > ia64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.18.50.20071116 assertion > fail ../../src/bfd/arange-set.c:667 Ah - this is the splay tree bug that HJ is working on. Sorry for making you chase this one down. Cheers Nick