From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12040 invoked by alias); 26 Dec 2007 19:02:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 12032 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Dec 2007 19:02:06 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 19:02:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lBQJ20mw010956 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 14:02:00 -0500 Received: from pobox.fab.redhat.com (pobox.fab.redhat.com [10.33.63.12]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lBQJ20Gk018202 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 14:02:00 -0500 Received: from [10.32.4.53] (vpn-4-53.str.redhat.com [10.32.4.53]) by pobox.fab.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lBQJ1xo7009765 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 14:01:59 -0500 Message-ID: <4772A539.8050906@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 19:02:00 -0000 From: Nick Clifton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20071018) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: LMA XXX Overlaps Previous Sections When Using PHDRS References: <3517CACAE247DD498B74D4B65A379E95270856@corpcboemb01.edocorp.com> <476FEA82.1070501@redhat.com> <20071225230849.GA23286@bubble.grove.modra.org> In-Reply-To: <20071225230849.GA23286@bubble.grove.modra.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00148.txt.bz2 Hi Alan, >> This is a bogus error message due to a spurious check in the linker. > > Eh? I think the error message is correct. We really do have an error > of some sort here, most likely the linker ignoring phdr "AT" when > assigning section lmas in ldlang.c. Ok - can you explain what that piece of code was doing then ? I could not work out what it was trying to achieve. Cheers Nick