* binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available
@ 2008-10-02 8:40 Tristan Gingold
2008-10-02 9:17 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-10-06 13:30 ` Matthias Klose
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Tristan Gingold @ 2008-10-02 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils
Hi,
I have just uploaded binutils-2.18.92.tar.bz2 on sourceware.
d356120dba2d713e36b6b48dc9032698 binutils-2.18.92.tar.bz2
This snapshot was sanity-checked on x86_64-suse-linux.
Please test it for your favorite hosts/targets.
Tristan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available
2008-10-02 8:40 binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available Tristan Gingold
@ 2008-10-02 9:17 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-10-02 9:25 ` Tristan Gingold
2008-10-06 13:30 ` Matthias Klose
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2008-10-02 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: binutils
Tristan Gingold <gingold@ACT-Europe.FR> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have just uploaded binutils-2.18.92.tar.bz2 on sourceware.
>
> d356120dba2d713e36b6b48dc9032698 binutils-2.18.92.tar.bz2
>
> This snapshot was sanity-checked on x86_64-suse-linux.
> Please test it for your favorite hosts/targets.
Running /usr/src/packages/BUILD/binutils-2.18.92/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/eh-group.exp ...
ERROR: /usr/src/packages/BUILD/binutils-2.18.92/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/eh-group1.s: assembly failed
FAIL: Link eh-group.o to eh-group
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available
2008-10-02 9:17 ` Andreas Schwab
@ 2008-10-02 9:25 ` Tristan Gingold
2008-10-02 9:28 ` Andreas Schwab
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Tristan Gingold @ 2008-10-02 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Schwab; +Cc: Tristan Gingold, binutils
On Oct 2, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Running /usr/src/packages/BUILD/binutils-2.18.92/ld/testsuite/ld-
> elf/eh-group.exp ...
> ERROR: /usr/src/packages/BUILD/binutils-2.18.92/ld/testsuite/ld-
> elf/eh-group1.s: assembly failed
> FAIL: Link eh-group.o to eh-group
Can you give more detail (host, target, as message) ?
This test passes on my SLES 10 x86-64 machine.
Tristan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available
2008-10-02 9:25 ` Tristan Gingold
@ 2008-10-02 9:28 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-10-02 9:38 ` Tristan Gingold
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2008-10-02 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: Tristan Gingold, binutils
Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> writes:
> On Oct 2, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
>> Running /usr/src/packages/BUILD/binutils-2.18.92/ld/testsuite/ld-
>> elf/eh-group.exp ...
>> ERROR: /usr/src/packages/BUILD/binutils-2.18.92/ld/testsuite/ld-
>> elf/eh-group1.s: assembly failed
>> FAIL: Link eh-group.o to eh-group
>
> Can you give more detail (host, target, as message) ?
See <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00135.html>.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available
2008-10-02 9:28 ` Andreas Schwab
@ 2008-10-02 9:38 ` Tristan Gingold
2008-10-02 9:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-10-02 15:01 ` Nick Clifton
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Tristan Gingold @ 2008-10-02 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils; +Cc: Andreas Schwab
On Oct 2, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> writes:
>
>> On Oct 2, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>
>>> Running /usr/src/packages/BUILD/binutils-2.18.92/ld/testsuite/ld-
>>> elf/eh-group.exp ...
>>> ERROR: /usr/src/packages/BUILD/binutils-2.18.92/ld/testsuite/ld-
>>> elf/eh-group1.s: assembly failed
>>> FAIL: Link eh-group.o to eh-group
>>
>> Can you give more detail (host, target, as message) ?
>
> See <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00135.html>.
Ok, this testsuite fix should go in the branch as well.
Can a maintainer approve this ?
Tristan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available
2008-10-02 9:38 ` Tristan Gingold
@ 2008-10-02 9:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-10-02 9:57 ` Tristan Gingold
2008-10-02 15:01 ` Nick Clifton
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2008-10-02 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: binutils
Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> writes:
> Ok, this testsuite fix should go in the branch as well.
> Can a maintainer approve this ?
I think as a release manager you can do that yourself. There is also
this rule:
--------- Branch Checkins ---------
If a patch is approved for check in to the mainline sources, it can
also be checked into the current release branch.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available
2008-10-02 9:51 ` Andreas Schwab
@ 2008-10-02 9:57 ` Tristan Gingold
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Tristan Gingold @ 2008-10-02 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Schwab; +Cc: binutils
On Oct 2, 2008, at 11:50 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> writes:
>
>> Ok, this testsuite fix should go in the branch as well.
>> Can a maintainer approve this ?
>
> I think as a release manager you can do that yourself. There is also
> this rule:
>
> --------- Branch Checkins ---------
>
> If a patch is approved for check in to the mainline sources, it can
> also be checked into the current release branch.
Ah thanks. The rule is clear enough.
Tristan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available
2008-10-02 9:38 ` Tristan Gingold
2008-10-02 9:51 ` Andreas Schwab
@ 2008-10-02 15:01 ` Nick Clifton
2008-10-03 12:59 ` Tristan Gingold
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2008-10-02 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: binutils, Andreas Schwab
Hi Tristan,
>>> Can you give more detail (host, target, as message) ?
>>
>> See <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00135.html>.
> Ok, this testsuite fix should go in the branch as well.
> Can a maintainer approve this ?
It's your call. There is a shorter version of the patch here:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00138.html
which Jan feels would be more appropriate for the 2.19 branch (because
it causes less disruption to the testsuite harness I assume). Or you
could apply the full version of the patch from here:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00145.html
Please consider either version approved for inclusion into the branch
and pick the one you most prefer.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available
2008-10-02 15:01 ` Nick Clifton
@ 2008-10-03 12:59 ` Tristan Gingold
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Tristan Gingold @ 2008-10-03 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton; +Cc: binutils, Andreas Schwab
On Oct 2, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Tristan,
>
>>>> Can you give more detail (host, target, as message) ?
>>>
>>> See <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00135.html>.
>
>> Ok, this testsuite fix should go in the branch as well.
>> Can a maintainer approve this ?
>
> It's your call. There is a shorter version of the patch here:
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00138.html
>
> which Jan feels would be more appropriate for the 2.19 branch
> (because it causes less disruption to the testsuite harness I
> assume). Or you could apply the full version of the patch from here:
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00145.html
>
> Please consider either version approved for inclusion into the
> branch and pick the one you most prefer.
Ok, I committed the full version.
Thanks,
Tristan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available
2008-10-02 8:40 binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available Tristan Gingold
2008-10-02 9:17 ` Andreas Schwab
@ 2008-10-06 13:30 ` Matthias Klose
2008-10-07 8:41 ` Tristan Gingold
2008-10-07 10:28 ` binutils regressions (Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available) Matthias Klose
1 sibling, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Klose @ 2008-10-06 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: binutils, debian-mips
Tristan Gingold schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I have just uploaded binutils-2.18.92.tar.bz2 on sourceware.
>
> d356120dba2d713e36b6b48dc9032698 binutils-2.18.92.tar.bz2
>
> This snapshot was sanity-checked on x86_64-suse-linux.
> Please test it for your favorite hosts/targets.
>
> Tristan.
I did build cvs 20081003 taken from the branch for both Debian and Ubuntu, there are regressions on
mips/mipsel, compared to the 2.18 branch.
Matthias
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/2.18.92.20081003-0ubuntu1
binutils i486, amd64, oa64, powerpc, sparc:
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp ...
Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/objdump 2.18.92.20081003
FAIL: objdump -W
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp ...
Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/readelf 2.18.92.20081003
FAIL: readelf -wa (compressed)
ld sparc:
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-sparc/sparc.exp ...
ERROR: --64 -K PIC /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-sparc/gotop64.s: assembly
failed
http://experimental.debian.net/build.php?pkg=binutils
s390, powerpc, alpha, ia64, sparc binutils:
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp ...
Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/objdump 2.18.92.20081003
FAIL: objdump -W
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp ...
Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/readelf 2.18.92.20081003
FAIL: readelf -wa (compressed)
s390 ld:
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-undefined/undefined.exp ...
XPASS: undefined line
mipsel binutils:
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp ...
Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/objcopy 2.18.92.20081003
FAIL: simple objcopy of debug data
mips, mipsel gas:
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/gas/testsuite/gas/mips/mips.exp ...
FAIL: MIPS octeon instructions (octeon)
FAIL: MIPS align maximum
mips, mipsel ld (regressions compared to 2.18):
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/dwarf.exp ...
FAIL: Run with libdwarf1.so first
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/elf.exp ...
FAIL: ld-elf/eh5
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/sec64k.exp ...
FAIL: ld-elf/64ksec
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/shared.exp ...
FAIL: Run with libdl2a.so
FAIL: Run with libdl4a.so
FAIL: Run with libdl4b.so
FAIL: Run with libdl4e.so
FAIL: Run with libdl4f.so
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elfvers/vers.exp ...
FAIL: vers2
FAIL: vers22
FAIL: vers24a
FAIL: vers24b
FAIL: vers24c
FAIL: vers26b1
FAIL: vers26b2
FAIL: vers26b3
FAIL: vers27d2
FAIL: vers27d3
FAIL: vers27d4
FAIL: vers27d5
FAIL: vers28c
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp ...
FAIL: visibility (hidden) (non PIC)
FAIL: visibility (hidden)
FAIL: visibility (hidden) (PIC main, non PIC so)
FAIL: visibility (hidden) (PIC main)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_normal) (non PIC)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_normal)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_normal) (PIC main, non PIC so)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_normal) (PIC main)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef) (non PIC)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef) (non PIC, load offset)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef) (PIC main, non PIC so)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef) (PIC main)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef_def) (non PIC)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef_def)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef_def) (PIC main, non PIC so)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef_def) (PIC main)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main)
FAIL: visibility (protected) (non PIC)
FAIL: visibility (protected)
FAIL: visibility (protected) (PIC main, non PIC so)
FAIL: visibility (protected) (PIC main)
FAIL: visibility (protected_undef) (non PIC)
FAIL: visibility (protected_undef) (non PIC, load offset)
FAIL: visibility (protected_undef)
FAIL: visibility (protected_undef) (PIC main, non PIC so)
FAIL: visibility (protected_undef) (PIC main)
FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def) (non PIC)
FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def)
FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def) (PIC main, non PIC so)
FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def) (PIC main)
FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (non PIC)
FAIL: visibility (protected_weak)
FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so)
FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main)
FAIL: visibility (normal) (non PIC)
FAIL: visibility (normal)
FAIL: visibility (normal) (PIC main, non PIC so)
FAIL: visibility (normal) (PIC main)
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak/elfweak.exp ...
FAIL: ELF weak
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-selective/selective.exp ...
ERROR: /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-selective/3.cc: compilation failed
ERROR: /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-selective/4.cc: compilation failed
ERROR: /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-selective/5.cc: compilation failed
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-shared/shared.exp ...
FAIL: shared (non PIC)
FAIL: shared
FAIL: shared -Bsymbolic
FAIL: shared (PIC main, non PIC so)
FAIL: shared (PIC main)
binutils mips:
Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/objcopy 2.18.92.20081003
FAIL: simple objcopy of debug data
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp ...
Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/objdump 2.18.92.20081003
FAIL: objdump -W
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp ...
Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/readelf 2.18.92.20081003
FAIL: readelf -wa (compressed)
ld alpha:
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/elf.exp ...
FAIL: ld-elf/stab
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elfvers/vers.exp ...
FAIL: vers24a
FAIL: vers24b
FAIL: vers24c
FAIL: vers30
FAIL: vers31
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-libs/libs.exp ...
ERROR: /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-libs/lib-1.s: assembly failed
ERROR: /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-libs/lib-2.s: assembly failed
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/defined.exp ...
ERROR: /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/defined.s: assembly failed
binutils hppa:
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp ...
Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/objcopy 2.18.92.20081003
ERROR: /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/localize-hidden-1.s:
assembly failed
ERROR: /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/localize-hidden-2.s:
assembly failed
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp ...
Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/objdump 2.18.92.20081003
FAIL: objdump -W
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp ...
Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/readelf 2.18.92.20081003
FAIL: readelf -wa (compressed)
gas hppa:
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/gas/testsuite/gas/hppa/parse/parse.exp ...
XPASS: Check min/max values for .block
ld hppa:
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/elf.exp ...
XPASS: ld-elf/merge
ld sparc (32bit userland):
Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-sparc/sparc.exp ...
ERROR: --64 -K PIC /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-sparc/gotop64.s: assembly
failed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available
2008-10-06 13:30 ` Matthias Klose
@ 2008-10-07 8:41 ` Tristan Gingold
2008-10-07 10:28 ` binutils regressions (Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available) Matthias Klose
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Tristan Gingold @ 2008-10-07 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthias Klose; +Cc: binutils, debian-mips
> I did build cvs 20081003 taken from the branch for both Debian and
> Ubuntu, there are regressions on
> mips/mipsel, compared to the 2.18 branch.
Thank you for this extensive testing.
mips/mipsel has indeed many regressions. I will analyze the results
on mips.
Tristan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* binutils regressions (Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available)
2008-10-06 13:30 ` Matthias Klose
2008-10-07 8:41 ` Tristan Gingold
@ 2008-10-07 10:28 ` Matthias Klose
2008-10-07 10:52 ` Matthias Klose
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Klose @ 2008-10-07 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: binutils
Matthias Klose schrieb:
> binutils i486, amd64, oa64, powerpc, sparc:
> Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp ...
> Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/objdump 2.18.92.20081003
> FAIL: objdump -W
> Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp ...
> Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/readelf 2.18.92.20081003
> FAIL: readelf -wa (compressed)
these did start to fail between 20080707 and 20080814.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils regressions (Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available)
2008-10-07 10:28 ` binutils regressions (Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available) Matthias Klose
@ 2008-10-07 10:52 ` Matthias Klose
2008-10-07 13:01 ` Tristan Gingold
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Klose @ 2008-10-07 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: binutils
Matthias Klose schrieb:
> Matthias Klose schrieb:
>> binutils i486, amd64, oa64, powerpc, sparc:
>> Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp ...
>> Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/objdump 2.18.92.20081003
>> FAIL: objdump -W
>> Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp ...
>> Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/readelf 2.18.92.20081003
>> FAIL: readelf -wa (compressed)
>
> these did start to fail between 20080707 and 20080814.
my mistake. missing build dependency on zlib-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils regressions (Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available)
2008-10-07 10:52 ` Matthias Klose
@ 2008-10-07 13:01 ` Tristan Gingold
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Tristan Gingold @ 2008-10-07 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthias Klose; +Cc: binutils
On Oct 7, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Matthias Klose schrieb:
>> Matthias Klose schrieb:
>>> binutils i486, amd64, oa64, powerpc, sparc:
>>> Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/
>>> testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp ...
>>> Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/
>>> binutils/objdump 2.18.92.20081003
>>> FAIL: objdump -W
>>> Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/
>>> testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp ...
>>> Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/
>>> binutils/readelf 2.18.92.20081003
>>> FAIL: readelf -wa (compressed)
>>
>> these did start to fail between 20080707 and 20080814.
>
> my mistake. missing build dependency on zlib-dev
That's coherent with my tests as there are no failures on x86 nor ppc.
Good!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-07 13:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-02 8:40 binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available Tristan Gingold
2008-10-02 9:17 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-10-02 9:25 ` Tristan Gingold
2008-10-02 9:28 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-10-02 9:38 ` Tristan Gingold
2008-10-02 9:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-10-02 9:57 ` Tristan Gingold
2008-10-02 15:01 ` Nick Clifton
2008-10-03 12:59 ` Tristan Gingold
2008-10-06 13:30 ` Matthias Klose
2008-10-07 8:41 ` Tristan Gingold
2008-10-07 10:28 ` binutils regressions (Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available) Matthias Klose
2008-10-07 10:52 ` Matthias Klose
2008-10-07 13:01 ` Tristan Gingold
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).