* binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available @ 2008-10-02 8:40 Tristan Gingold 2008-10-02 9:17 ` Andreas Schwab 2008-10-06 13:30 ` Matthias Klose 0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Tristan Gingold @ 2008-10-02 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: binutils Hi, I have just uploaded binutils-2.18.92.tar.bz2 on sourceware. d356120dba2d713e36b6b48dc9032698 binutils-2.18.92.tar.bz2 This snapshot was sanity-checked on x86_64-suse-linux. Please test it for your favorite hosts/targets. Tristan. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available 2008-10-02 8:40 binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available Tristan Gingold @ 2008-10-02 9:17 ` Andreas Schwab 2008-10-02 9:25 ` Tristan Gingold 2008-10-06 13:30 ` Matthias Klose 1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Andreas Schwab @ 2008-10-02 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: binutils Tristan Gingold <gingold@ACT-Europe.FR> writes: > Hi, > > I have just uploaded binutils-2.18.92.tar.bz2 on sourceware. > > d356120dba2d713e36b6b48dc9032698 binutils-2.18.92.tar.bz2 > > This snapshot was sanity-checked on x86_64-suse-linux. > Please test it for your favorite hosts/targets. Running /usr/src/packages/BUILD/binutils-2.18.92/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/eh-group.exp ... ERROR: /usr/src/packages/BUILD/binutils-2.18.92/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/eh-group1.s: assembly failed FAIL: Link eh-group.o to eh-group Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available 2008-10-02 9:17 ` Andreas Schwab @ 2008-10-02 9:25 ` Tristan Gingold 2008-10-02 9:28 ` Andreas Schwab 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Tristan Gingold @ 2008-10-02 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Schwab; +Cc: Tristan Gingold, binutils On Oct 2, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Running /usr/src/packages/BUILD/binutils-2.18.92/ld/testsuite/ld- > elf/eh-group.exp ... > ERROR: /usr/src/packages/BUILD/binutils-2.18.92/ld/testsuite/ld- > elf/eh-group1.s: assembly failed > FAIL: Link eh-group.o to eh-group Can you give more detail (host, target, as message) ? This test passes on my SLES 10 x86-64 machine. Tristan. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available 2008-10-02 9:25 ` Tristan Gingold @ 2008-10-02 9:28 ` Andreas Schwab 2008-10-02 9:38 ` Tristan Gingold 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Andreas Schwab @ 2008-10-02 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: Tristan Gingold, binutils Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> writes: > On Oct 2, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > >> Running /usr/src/packages/BUILD/binutils-2.18.92/ld/testsuite/ld- >> elf/eh-group.exp ... >> ERROR: /usr/src/packages/BUILD/binutils-2.18.92/ld/testsuite/ld- >> elf/eh-group1.s: assembly failed >> FAIL: Link eh-group.o to eh-group > > Can you give more detail (host, target, as message) ? See <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00135.html>. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available 2008-10-02 9:28 ` Andreas Schwab @ 2008-10-02 9:38 ` Tristan Gingold 2008-10-02 9:51 ` Andreas Schwab 2008-10-02 15:01 ` Nick Clifton 0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Tristan Gingold @ 2008-10-02 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: binutils; +Cc: Andreas Schwab On Oct 2, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> writes: > >> On Oct 2, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> >>> Running /usr/src/packages/BUILD/binutils-2.18.92/ld/testsuite/ld- >>> elf/eh-group.exp ... >>> ERROR: /usr/src/packages/BUILD/binutils-2.18.92/ld/testsuite/ld- >>> elf/eh-group1.s: assembly failed >>> FAIL: Link eh-group.o to eh-group >> >> Can you give more detail (host, target, as message) ? > > See <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00135.html>. Ok, this testsuite fix should go in the branch as well. Can a maintainer approve this ? Tristan. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available 2008-10-02 9:38 ` Tristan Gingold @ 2008-10-02 9:51 ` Andreas Schwab 2008-10-02 9:57 ` Tristan Gingold 2008-10-02 15:01 ` Nick Clifton 1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Andreas Schwab @ 2008-10-02 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: binutils Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> writes: > Ok, this testsuite fix should go in the branch as well. > Can a maintainer approve this ? I think as a release manager you can do that yourself. There is also this rule: --------- Branch Checkins --------- If a patch is approved for check in to the mainline sources, it can also be checked into the current release branch. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available 2008-10-02 9:51 ` Andreas Schwab @ 2008-10-02 9:57 ` Tristan Gingold 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Tristan Gingold @ 2008-10-02 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Schwab; +Cc: binutils On Oct 2, 2008, at 11:50 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> writes: > >> Ok, this testsuite fix should go in the branch as well. >> Can a maintainer approve this ? > > I think as a release manager you can do that yourself. There is also > this rule: > > --------- Branch Checkins --------- > > If a patch is approved for check in to the mainline sources, it can > also be checked into the current release branch. Ah thanks. The rule is clear enough. Tristan. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available 2008-10-02 9:38 ` Tristan Gingold 2008-10-02 9:51 ` Andreas Schwab @ 2008-10-02 15:01 ` Nick Clifton 2008-10-03 12:59 ` Tristan Gingold 1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Nick Clifton @ 2008-10-02 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: binutils, Andreas Schwab Hi Tristan, >>> Can you give more detail (host, target, as message) ? >> >> See <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00135.html>. > Ok, this testsuite fix should go in the branch as well. > Can a maintainer approve this ? It's your call. There is a shorter version of the patch here: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00138.html which Jan feels would be more appropriate for the 2.19 branch (because it causes less disruption to the testsuite harness I assume). Or you could apply the full version of the patch from here: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00145.html Please consider either version approved for inclusion into the branch and pick the one you most prefer. Cheers Nick ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available 2008-10-02 15:01 ` Nick Clifton @ 2008-10-03 12:59 ` Tristan Gingold 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Tristan Gingold @ 2008-10-03 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nick Clifton; +Cc: binutils, Andreas Schwab On Oct 2, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Tristan, > >>>> Can you give more detail (host, target, as message) ? >>> >>> See <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00135.html>. > >> Ok, this testsuite fix should go in the branch as well. >> Can a maintainer approve this ? > > It's your call. There is a shorter version of the patch here: > > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00138.html > > which Jan feels would be more appropriate for the 2.19 branch > (because it causes less disruption to the testsuite harness I > assume). Or you could apply the full version of the patch from here: > > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00145.html > > Please consider either version approved for inclusion into the > branch and pick the one you most prefer. Ok, I committed the full version. Thanks, Tristan. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available 2008-10-02 8:40 binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available Tristan Gingold 2008-10-02 9:17 ` Andreas Schwab @ 2008-10-06 13:30 ` Matthias Klose 2008-10-07 8:41 ` Tristan Gingold 2008-10-07 10:28 ` binutils regressions (Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available) Matthias Klose 1 sibling, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Matthias Klose @ 2008-10-06 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: binutils, debian-mips Tristan Gingold schrieb: > Hi, > > I have just uploaded binutils-2.18.92.tar.bz2 on sourceware. > > d356120dba2d713e36b6b48dc9032698 binutils-2.18.92.tar.bz2 > > This snapshot was sanity-checked on x86_64-suse-linux. > Please test it for your favorite hosts/targets. > > Tristan. I did build cvs 20081003 taken from the branch for both Debian and Ubuntu, there are regressions on mips/mipsel, compared to the 2.18 branch. Matthias https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/2.18.92.20081003-0ubuntu1 binutils i486, amd64, oa64, powerpc, sparc: Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp ... Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/objdump 2.18.92.20081003 FAIL: objdump -W Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp ... Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/readelf 2.18.92.20081003 FAIL: readelf -wa (compressed) ld sparc: Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-sparc/sparc.exp ... ERROR: --64 -K PIC /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-sparc/gotop64.s: assembly failed http://experimental.debian.net/build.php?pkg=binutils s390, powerpc, alpha, ia64, sparc binutils: Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp ... Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/objdump 2.18.92.20081003 FAIL: objdump -W Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp ... Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/readelf 2.18.92.20081003 FAIL: readelf -wa (compressed) s390 ld: Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-undefined/undefined.exp ... XPASS: undefined line mipsel binutils: Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp ... Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/objcopy 2.18.92.20081003 FAIL: simple objcopy of debug data mips, mipsel gas: Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/gas/testsuite/gas/mips/mips.exp ... FAIL: MIPS octeon instructions (octeon) FAIL: MIPS align maximum mips, mipsel ld (regressions compared to 2.18): Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/dwarf.exp ... FAIL: Run with libdwarf1.so first Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/elf.exp ... FAIL: ld-elf/eh5 Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/sec64k.exp ... FAIL: ld-elf/64ksec Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/shared.exp ... FAIL: Run with libdl2a.so FAIL: Run with libdl4a.so FAIL: Run with libdl4b.so FAIL: Run with libdl4e.so FAIL: Run with libdl4f.so Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elfvers/vers.exp ... FAIL: vers2 FAIL: vers22 FAIL: vers24a FAIL: vers24b FAIL: vers24c FAIL: vers26b1 FAIL: vers26b2 FAIL: vers26b3 FAIL: vers27d2 FAIL: vers27d3 FAIL: vers27d4 FAIL: vers27d5 FAIL: vers28c Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp ... FAIL: visibility (hidden) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (hidden) FAIL: visibility (hidden) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (hidden) (PIC main) FAIL: visibility (hidden_normal) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (hidden_normal) FAIL: visibility (hidden_normal) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (hidden_normal) (PIC main) FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef) (non PIC, load offset) FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef) FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef) (PIC main) FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef_def) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef_def) FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef_def) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef_def) (PIC main) FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main) FAIL: visibility (protected) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (protected) FAIL: visibility (protected) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (protected) (PIC main) FAIL: visibility (protected_undef) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (protected_undef) (non PIC, load offset) FAIL: visibility (protected_undef) FAIL: visibility (protected_undef) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (protected_undef) (PIC main) FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def) FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def) (PIC main) FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main) FAIL: visibility (normal) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (normal) FAIL: visibility (normal) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (normal) (PIC main) Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak/elfweak.exp ... FAIL: ELF weak Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-selective/selective.exp ... ERROR: /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-selective/3.cc: compilation failed ERROR: /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-selective/4.cc: compilation failed ERROR: /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-selective/5.cc: compilation failed Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-shared/shared.exp ... FAIL: shared (non PIC) FAIL: shared FAIL: shared -Bsymbolic FAIL: shared (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: shared (PIC main) binutils mips: Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/objcopy 2.18.92.20081003 FAIL: simple objcopy of debug data Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp ... Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/objdump 2.18.92.20081003 FAIL: objdump -W Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp ... Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/readelf 2.18.92.20081003 FAIL: readelf -wa (compressed) ld alpha: Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/elf.exp ... FAIL: ld-elf/stab Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elfvers/vers.exp ... FAIL: vers24a FAIL: vers24b FAIL: vers24c FAIL: vers30 FAIL: vers31 Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-libs/libs.exp ... ERROR: /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-libs/lib-1.s: assembly failed ERROR: /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-libs/lib-2.s: assembly failed Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/defined.exp ... ERROR: /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/defined.s: assembly failed binutils hppa: Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp ... Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/objcopy 2.18.92.20081003 ERROR: /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/localize-hidden-1.s: assembly failed ERROR: /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/localize-hidden-2.s: assembly failed Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp ... Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/objdump 2.18.92.20081003 FAIL: objdump -W Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp ... Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/readelf 2.18.92.20081003 FAIL: readelf -wa (compressed) gas hppa: Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/gas/testsuite/gas/hppa/parse/parse.exp ... XPASS: Check min/max values for .block ld hppa: Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/elf.exp ... XPASS: ld-elf/merge ld sparc (32bit userland): Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-sparc/sparc.exp ... ERROR: --64 -K PIC /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/ld/testsuite/ld-sparc/gotop64.s: assembly failed ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available 2008-10-06 13:30 ` Matthias Klose @ 2008-10-07 8:41 ` Tristan Gingold 2008-10-07 10:28 ` binutils regressions (Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available) Matthias Klose 1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Tristan Gingold @ 2008-10-07 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthias Klose; +Cc: binutils, debian-mips > I did build cvs 20081003 taken from the branch for both Debian and > Ubuntu, there are regressions on > mips/mipsel, compared to the 2.18 branch. Thank you for this extensive testing. mips/mipsel has indeed many regressions. I will analyze the results on mips. Tristan. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* binutils regressions (Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available) 2008-10-06 13:30 ` Matthias Klose 2008-10-07 8:41 ` Tristan Gingold @ 2008-10-07 10:28 ` Matthias Klose 2008-10-07 10:52 ` Matthias Klose 1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Matthias Klose @ 2008-10-07 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: binutils Matthias Klose schrieb: > binutils i486, amd64, oa64, powerpc, sparc: > Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp ... > Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/objdump 2.18.92.20081003 > FAIL: objdump -W > Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp ... > Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/readelf 2.18.92.20081003 > FAIL: readelf -wa (compressed) these did start to fail between 20080707 and 20080814. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils regressions (Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available) 2008-10-07 10:28 ` binutils regressions (Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available) Matthias Klose @ 2008-10-07 10:52 ` Matthias Klose 2008-10-07 13:01 ` Tristan Gingold 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Matthias Klose @ 2008-10-07 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: binutils Matthias Klose schrieb: > Matthias Klose schrieb: >> binutils i486, amd64, oa64, powerpc, sparc: >> Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp ... >> Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/objdump 2.18.92.20081003 >> FAIL: objdump -W >> Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp ... >> Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/binutils/readelf 2.18.92.20081003 >> FAIL: readelf -wa (compressed) > > these did start to fail between 20080707 and 20080814. my mistake. missing build dependency on zlib-dev ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: binutils regressions (Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available) 2008-10-07 10:52 ` Matthias Klose @ 2008-10-07 13:01 ` Tristan Gingold 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Tristan Gingold @ 2008-10-07 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthias Klose; +Cc: binutils On Oct 7, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > Matthias Klose schrieb: >> Matthias Klose schrieb: >>> binutils i486, amd64, oa64, powerpc, sparc: >>> Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/ >>> testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp ... >>> Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/ >>> binutils/objdump 2.18.92.20081003 >>> FAIL: objdump -W >>> Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/ >>> testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp ... >>> Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/ >>> binutils/readelf 2.18.92.20081003 >>> FAIL: readelf -wa (compressed) >> >> these did start to fail between 20080707 and 20080814. > > my mistake. missing build dependency on zlib-dev That's coherent with my tests as there are no failures on x86 nor ppc. Good! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-07 13:01 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2008-10-02 8:40 binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available Tristan Gingold 2008-10-02 9:17 ` Andreas Schwab 2008-10-02 9:25 ` Tristan Gingold 2008-10-02 9:28 ` Andreas Schwab 2008-10-02 9:38 ` Tristan Gingold 2008-10-02 9:51 ` Andreas Schwab 2008-10-02 9:57 ` Tristan Gingold 2008-10-02 15:01 ` Nick Clifton 2008-10-03 12:59 ` Tristan Gingold 2008-10-06 13:30 ` Matthias Klose 2008-10-07 8:41 ` Tristan Gingold 2008-10-07 10:28 ` binutils regressions (Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available) Matthias Klose 2008-10-07 10:52 ` Matthias Klose 2008-10-07 13:01 ` Tristan Gingold
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).