From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21200 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2010 07:17:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 21189 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Sep 2010 07:17:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 07:16:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B3CCB023D; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:16:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SacyQpG3JNJS; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:16:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.1.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCAD7CB01D6; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:16:51 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Release 2.21 - rough schedule Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Tristan Gingold In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 07:17:00 -0000 Cc: Richard Sandiford , binutils@sourceware.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <49757AA1-B768-4A3E-A3D2-9C95364DC66D@adacore.com> References: <48A902C2-D801-401E-8FC1-3E5179D66B70@adacore.com> <20100918025913.GG16874@bubble.grove.modra.org> <1284997687.13878.32.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20100921003158.GL16874@bubble.grove.modra.org> <87lj6tpocq.fsf@firetop.home> To: Maciej W. Rozycki X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00407.txt.bz2 On Sep 23, 2010, at 12:58 AM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Richard Sandiford wrote: > >> Talking about deprecation, I wonder if anyone uses the non-ELF MIPS >> ports with up-to-date binutils? mips-ecoff has had terrible testresults >> for a while, but I've no idea whether the failures are benign. > > At least the capability to `objcopy' to ecoff-*mips has to stay for the > sake of some old systems' firmware requiring that format for boot images > (though some may prefer the `elf2ecoff' tool lurking around). Therefore > I'd expect a need for the BFD target to stay for the foreseeable future; > the rest may or may not be required -- AFAIR DEC Ultrix support was > dropped from GCC a while ago; can't say about SGI IRIX or MIPSCO systems. SGI Irix is ELF.