From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-60960-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24391 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2009 16:21:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 24197 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Aug 2009 16:21:12 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-bw0-f208.google.com (HELO mail-bw0-f208.google.com) (209.85.218.208)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:21:01 +0000
Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so1699409bwz.0         for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.58.79 with SMTP id f15mr1714179bkh.138.1250353257983;         Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scientist-2.local ([85.93.118.17])         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm3188841fks.9.2009.08.15.09.20.56         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);         Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4A86E085.1000409@gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:21:00 -0000
From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>,   Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,  gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org,   bonzini@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/N] The big bump
References: <20090815112928.GB5396@gmx.de> <20090815113356.GD20172@gmx.de> <84fc9c000908150448p73a22bbbm59c7abbccfc7f225@mail.gmail.com> <20090815122258.GF20172@gmx.de> <20090815122907.GA20449@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <20090815122907.GA20449@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00246.txt.bz2

Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 02:22:58PM CEST:
>> Since its release on 2009-07-26, Autoconf 2.64 has not seen a regression
>> that impacted GCC's use of it AFAICS (and only minor ones otherwise).
> 
> Ah, hm, except for
> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.bugs/6839>
> which is still pending.
> 
> Hmm.  Paolo, do you agree that we can probably fix this in
> config/override.m4 if we should?

Yes, we should fix it simply by dropping fopen from the program used in
the cross compilation + default file name test (like the
AC_LANG_NULL_PROGRAM in my patch).  It should be two lines in
override.m4, and they should be committed first.

Paolo