public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>,
	  "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	 Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>,
	binutils@sourceware.org,   gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/N] The big bump
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:40:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A8AFF0E.3010505@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090818191404.GB30961@gmx.de>

On 08/18/2009 09:14 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>    May I proceed in updating the tree to 2.64/1.11 before getting the rest
>    of the tree (that already has out-of-sync autotools) back into sync?

As far as I'm concerned, yes.  Nothing outside binutils/gdb/gcc has ever 
cared much about Autotools versions (and some parts like newlib/libgloss 
and winsup are not even CCed), it should be fine as long as we provide 
override.m4 to cover their bugs.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-18 19:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-15 11:29 Moving to Autoconf 2.64, Automake 1.11 Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-15 11:31 ` [PATCH 1/N] Update automake-provided files in the toplevel Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-15 11:33 ` [PATCH 3/N] some minor fixes in sim, gold, gdb Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-17 16:17   ` Tom Tromey
2009-08-17 16:19   ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-08-15 11:34 ` Moving to Autoconf 2.64, Automake 1.11 Gerald Pfeifer
2009-08-16  9:49   ` Do not point to sources.redhat.com for autotools tarballs (was: Moving to Autoconf 2.64, Automake 1.11) Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-16 17:23     ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-15 11:34 ` [PATCH 4/N] The big bump Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-15 11:49   ` Richard Guenther
2009-08-15 12:23     ` Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-15 12:29       ` Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-15 16:21         ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-08-17 20:47           ` fix 2.64 fopen glitch, disable option checking (was: [PATCH 4/N] The big bump) Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-17 22:52             ` fix 2.64 fopen glitch, disable option checking Paolo Bonzini
2009-08-15 14:41   ` [PATCH 4/N] The big bump Dave Korn
2009-08-15 16:04     ` Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-15 16:36       ` Dave Korn
     [not found]         ` <20090818191404.GB30961__32944.9385325008$1250622877$gmane$org@gmx.de>
2009-08-18 20:32           ` Tom Tromey
2009-08-24 17:31             ` Christopher Faylor
2009-08-24 19:17               ` updating autotools in the rest of src (was: [PATCH 4/N] The big bump) Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-15 16:26     ` [PATCH 4/N] The big bump Joseph S. Myers
2009-08-18 19:36       ` Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-18 19:40         ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2009-08-19  0:00         ` Dave Korn
2009-08-17 11:49   ` Nick Clifton
2009-08-18 18:18     ` Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-19  7:07       ` Nick Clifton
2009-08-23 13:24   ` Andreas Schwab
2009-08-23 13:31     ` yacc and lex reruns without maintainer-mode (was: [PATCH 4/N] The big bump) Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-24  7:18       ` Alan Modra
2009-08-15 11:35 ` [PATCH 5/N] post-update cleanups Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-15 16:58   ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-08-15 15:31 ` Moving to Autoconf 2.64, Automake 1.11 Joseph S. Myers
2009-08-15 16:07   ` Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-16 11:48     ` install-{html,pdf} (was: Moving to Autoconf 2.64, Automake 1.11) Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-17 12:12       ` install-{html,pdf} Paolo Bonzini
2009-08-15 18:04 ` Moving to Autoconf 2.64, Automake 1.11 Paolo Bonzini
2009-08-15 23:07   ` Ralf Wildenhues
     [not found] ` <20090815113449.GE20172__4676.41973305053$1250336143$gmane$org@gmx.de>
2009-08-17 16:19   ` [PATCH 5/N] post-update cleanups Tom Tromey
2009-08-23  9:44 ` Moving to Autoconf 2.64, Automake 1.11 Ralf Wildenhues
2009-08-27 14:23 ` Matthias Klose
2009-08-27 15:02   ` Matthias Klose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A8AFF0E.3010505@gnu.org \
    --to=bonzini@gnu.org \
    --cc=Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).