From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22407 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2010 13:22:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 22305 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Feb 2010 13:22:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from eu1sys200aog116.obsmtp.com (HELO eu1sys200aog116.obsmtp.com) (207.126.144.141) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:22:27 +0000 Received: from source ([164.129.1.35]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob116.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKS2l4e2W1/ogFK1cx2YJ1/BlYrJGXkViK@postini.com; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:22:27 UTC Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (ns2.st.com [164.129.230.9]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 6E064139; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:22:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail2.gnb.st.com (mail2.gnb.st.com [164.129.119.59]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id DAC551185; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:22:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [164.129.122.40] (gnx2504.gnb.st.com [164.129.122.40]) by mail2.gnb.st.com (MOS 3.8.7a) with ESMTP id DJE81128 (AUTH lyon); Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:24:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B697879.9050807@st.com> Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:22:00 -0000 From: Christophe LYON User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tristan Gingold Cc: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: binutils 2.20.1 References: <293186.66232.qm@web51508.mail.re2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 On 03.02.2010 14:08, Tristan Gingold wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2010, at 8:15 AM, Kenny Simpson wrote: > >> When is 2.20.1 expected out? > > Soon. There is still one issue to be solved (ARM related). > Are you talking about http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-01/msg00342.html ? If so, sorry for the delay I am still working on it, but during this process I have discovered other issues. In short, I think that http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-03/msg00511.html has broken thumb->arm intersection branches (and probably vice-versa). I have starting working on a patch I intend to propose for this one before finishing the other patch. Christophe.