From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1601 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2010 16:56:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 1591 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Oct 2010 16:56:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-gx0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-gx0-f169.google.com) (209.85.161.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:56:23 +0000 Received: by gxk2 with SMTP id 2so817912gxk.0 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:56:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.38.84 with SMTP id z62mr1994219wea.70.1288112181661; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:56:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.99] (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p4sm5208876wej.4.2010.10.26.09.56.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:56:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CC70DB1.1090607@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:56:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Korn , Kai Tietz , binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: SEC_NEVER_LOAD cleanup References: <20100916000335.GS16874@bubble.grove.modra.org> <4CB8BF7A.2090904@gmail.com> <20101016023559.GB26553@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20101017232913.GD26553@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20101018134330.GF26553@bubble.grove.modra.org> <4CBF06B3.8050202@gmail.com> <20101026124613.GD5348@bubble.grove.modra.org> In-Reply-To: <20101026124613.GD5348@bubble.grove.modra.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00443.txt.bz2 On 26/10/2010 13:46, Alan Modra wrote: > It seems we have irreconcilable differences between ELF and COFF in > the treatment of NOLOAD. How does the following look to you COFF > people? I have one more patch I want to get done for GCC before stage1 ends, and not a lot of time to do it in, whereas Tristan isn't planning to branch binutils until Nov 2-3, so I'm not going to come back to this for a couple of days, but thanks for sticking with it, I do intend to get this tied down before the branch. cheers, DaveK