From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-82817-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 30671 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2014 21:12:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 30660 invoked by uid 89); 3 Feb 2014 21:12:40 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: multi.imgtec.com
Received: from multi.imgtec.com (HELO multi.imgtec.com) (194.200.65.239) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 21:12:40 +0000
From: Jack Carter <Jack.Carter@imgtec.com>
To: Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com>
CC: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, "binutils@sourceware.org"	<binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [MIPS] Is it legal for the assembler to generate more than 64K sections?
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 21:12:00 -0000
Message-ID: <4CEFBC1BE64A8048869F799EF2D2EEEE4C6F2BA0@BADAG02.ba.imgtec.org>
References: <4CEFBC1BE64A8048869F799EF2D2EEEE4C6F2880@BADAG02.ba.imgtec.org>	<CAMe9rOrtyAQYyzRx4AbcmtCSKMr-rzjUcHEHsCAm60j_PhP5Uw@mail.gmail.com>	<4CEFBC1BE64A8048869F799EF2D2EEEE4C6F2AA2@BADAG02.ba.imgtec.org>	<87mwi87xeu.fsf@talisman.default>	<4CEFBC1BE64A8048869F799EF2D2EEEE4C6F2B73@BADAG02.ba.imgtec.org>,<87iosv9alm.fsf@talisman.default>
In-Reply-To: <87iosv9alm.fsf@talisman.default>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SEF-Processed: 7_3_0_01192__2014_02_03_21_12_37
X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2

>(.text._ZN4llvm25SmallVectorTemplateCommonIN5clang19RecursiveASTVisitorINS=
1_11AttrVisitorEE10EnqueueJobEvE4backEv[_ZN4llvm25SmallVectorTemplateCommon=
IN5clang19RecursiveASTVisitorINS1_11AttrVisitorEE10EnqueueJobEvE4backEv]+0x=
64):
>> relocation truncated to fit: R_MIPS_GOT16 against `no symbol'
>>
>> Basically building LLVM with a MIPS GCC. I noticed that the section
>> count was way above 16 bits and seized on that as being the culprit.
>
>Ah, OK.  Looks like a multigot failure at face value.  Are you using
>recent binutils (2.24)?  It has some fixes in that area.

I rebased on Thursday.

Multigot is a good area for me to look since I am mucking with the got with=
 ifunc anyway.

Cheers,

Jack

>
>Thanks,
>Richard