From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17584 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2010 17:55:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 17567 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Dec 2010 17:55:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-bw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.214.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:55:09 +0000 Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so18335892bwz.0 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 09:55:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.158.205 with SMTP id q55mr308312wek.76.1291658106919; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 09:55:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.99] (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x3sm2484629wes.46.2010.12.06.09.55.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 06 Dec 2010 09:55:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CFD2933.6040800@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:55:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H.J. Lu" CC: Cary Coutant , Ian Lance Taylor , GCC Development , Binutils , Tristan Gingold Subject: Re: PATCH: 2 stage BFD linker for LTO plugin References: <4CFD1C22.3090900@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00225.txt.bz2 On 06/12/2010 17:44, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Dave Korn wrote: >> Well, I reckon this patch is great (but don't have the approval rights). >> It's passed an lto-bootstrap of gcc on i686-pc-cygwin and the tests are well >> underway without anything abnormal showing up. >> > > Can we close > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42690 > > as invalid It's not invalid; GOLD linking with -static (explicit or implicit) would still have problems without the pass through. > and point the linker bug to > > http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12248 I added a reference to it to the gcc PR and closed it. cheers, DaveK