From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30774 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2011 22:52:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 30766 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Feb 2011 22:52:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-wy0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:52:47 +0000 Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so7744233wyj.0 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:52:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.156.15 with SMTP id u15mr346337wbw.220.1296600764838; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:52:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.99] (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u9sm6370091wbg.6.2011.02.01.14.52.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:52:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D4894C5.4000509@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:52:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H.J. Lu" CC: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: PATCH: PR ld/12277: Linker error: "final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output" References: <20110201203840.GA12996@intel.com> <4D487CED.7060603@gmail.com> <4D48800D.4020302@gmail.com> <4D488FD2.4030208@gmail.com> <4D489336.3000800@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D489336.3000800@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 On 01/02/2011 23:11, Dave Korn wrote: > I need to see what we're doing with the BFD usrdata field. A quick grep > suggests it points to the input statement, which if it can be relied on will > entirely obviate the need for either the suffix or an extra flag in BFD. No, or not directly, anyway; it isn't set early enough. cheers, DaveK