On 02/03/2011 11:44 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> 
>> TI has decided that for convenience they'd prefer if -march=c64x+ simply
>> enabled atomic instructions, even if they are not usable on all devices.
>> The following patch implements this. Ok?
> 
> It seems to me that if you treat these instructions as present on all 
> C64x+ and C674x then you should no longer need TIC6X_INSN_ATOMIC at all; 
> the instructions in question should just be marked as TIC6X_INSN_C64XP 
> instead.

Like this?


Bernd