From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15933 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2011 21:48:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 15925 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Feb 2011 21:48:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (HELO smtp5-g21.free.fr) (212.27.42.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:48:46 +0000 Received: from [81.57.227.177] (unknown [81.57.227.177]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72EFD48065 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 22:48:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4D530BB2.4000001@freesbee.fr> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:48:00 -0000 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vincent_Rivi=E8re?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Explicit architecture for m68k tests References: <4CE93874.2080004@freesbee.fr> <20101122053403.GE15607@bubble.grove.modra.org> <4CEAAC10.40102@freesbee.fr> <20101122213654.GG15607@bubble.grove.modra.org> In-Reply-To: <20101122213654.GG15607@bubble.grove.modra.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00088.txt.bz2 Le 22/11/2010 22:36, Alan Modra a écrit : >> ../src/configure --target=m68k-aout --disable-nls >> make >> cd gas >> make check >> FAIL: gas/m68k/mcf-coproc >> FAIL: mcf-wdebug >> FAIL: cpu32 >> >> With the proposed patch, the whole gas testsuite succeeds. > > I thought m68k-netbsd was aout, and running the testsuite on that > target succeeds. Huh, mystery solved. The difference is that > m68k-aout has a default target vector of aout0_big_vec while > m68k-netbsd uses m68knetbsd_vec. The latter has the architecture, the > former doesn't. > > Patch OK. Alan, could you please commit my patch ? For memory: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-11/msg00384.html -- Vincent Rivière