From: "Rafael Ávila de Espíndola" <respindola@mozilla.com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [5/6][PATCH] Perform second link stage and ignore now-obsolete linker -pass-through= option.
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D6AA7D3.5070006@mozilla.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mcr39n9i8oz.fsf@google.com>
> It is already the case that gold does not require -pass-through=. In
> fact, I've already modified the gcc plugin to ignore -pass-through= when
> using gold version 1.11 or greater (gold 1.11 will be in the binutils
> 2.21.1 release).
I had completely missed the addition of Plugin_rescan! I agree that gold
is now probably in the performance/feature sweet spot. Sorry about the
noise.
> Ian
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-27 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-26 0:44 [PATCH,trunk+2.20] Fix issues in ld.bfd plugin interface [0/6] Dave Korn
2011-02-26 0:45 ` [PATCH,trunk+2.21] " Dave Korn
2011-02-26 0:45 ` [1/6][PATCH] Fix PE-COFF bug in orphan section alignment handling Dave Korn
2011-02-26 9:14 ` Alan Modra
2011-02-26 0:46 ` [2/6][PATCH] Do not use dummy bfd suffix for recognition, make it human-readable instead Dave Korn
2011-02-26 0:46 ` [4/6][PATCH] Fix issue from GCC PR47527: no ELF flags, EABI attribs, etc. in dummy IR BFD Dave Korn
2011-02-26 0:48 ` Dave Korn
2011-02-26 9:16 ` Alan Modra
2011-02-26 0:46 ` [3/6][PATCH] Revise linker plugin API to better preserve link order Dave Korn
2011-02-26 9:15 ` Alan Modra
2011-02-26 0:46 ` [5/6][PATCH] Perform second link stage and ignore now-obsolete linker -pass-through= option Dave Korn
2011-02-26 0:48 ` Dave Korn
2011-02-26 4:03 ` Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
2011-02-27 18:54 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-02-27 19:11 ` Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
2011-02-27 19:22 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-02-27 19:37 ` Rafael Ávila de Espíndola [this message]
2011-02-26 9:05 ` Alan Modra
2011-02-26 0:47 ` [x/6][PATCH] Portability tweaks for LTO tests Dave Korn
2011-02-26 0:49 ` Dave Korn
2011-02-26 3:50 ` H.J. Lu
2011-02-26 5:33 ` H.J. Lu
2011-02-26 0:47 ` [6/6][PATCH] Respect symbol wrappers when computing symbol resolutions Dave Korn
2011-02-26 0:49 ` Dave Korn
2011-02-26 4:50 ` H.J. Lu
2011-02-26 9:28 ` Alan Modra
2011-02-26 2:14 ` [PATCH,trunk+2.20] Fix issues in ld.bfd plugin interface [0/6] H.J. Lu
2011-02-26 3:37 ` Dave Korn
2011-02-26 3:48 ` H.J. Lu
2011-03-10 10:43 ` Dave Korn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D6AA7D3.5070006@mozilla.com \
--to=respindola@mozilla.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=iant@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).