From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29531 invoked by alias); 6 May 2011 14:08:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 29520 invoked by uid 22791); 6 May 2011 14:08:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pv0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-pv0-f169.google.com) (74.125.83.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 14:08:21 +0000 Received: by pvc12 with SMTP id 12so2074729pvc.0 for ; Fri, 06 May 2011 07:08:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.59.72 with SMTP id x8mr4940354pbq.69.1304690900596; Fri, 06 May 2011 07:08:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pebble.twiddle.home (are.twiddle.net [75.101.38.216]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o1sm2165034pbn.54.2011.05.06.07.08.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 06 May 2011 07:08:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DC400D0.7090707@twiddle.net> Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 14:08:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Cree CC: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org, binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Problems with linker on Alpha References: <4DBCC489.9020602@orcon.net.nz> <4DBF055E.1070701@twiddle.net> <4DBFC90E.5090905@orcon.net.nz> <4DC3CC9E.3080905@orcon.net.nz> In-Reply-To: <4DC3CC9E.3080905@orcon.net.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 On 05/06/2011 03:25 AM, Michael Cree wrote: > So my question is, what is this "[: 80]"? Does it matter? Is this failure a false report? It's these: /* Legal values for st_other field of Elf64_Sym. */ #define STO_ALPHA_NOPV 0x80 /* No PV required. */ #define STO_ALPHA_STD_GPLOAD 0x88 /* PV only used for initial ldgp. */ They're used for relaxation, and they don't matter for the purposes of this test. I think the regexp can be equivalently written +[0-9]+: +[0-9a-f]+ +[0-9a-f]+ +FUNC +LOCAL +DEFAULT .+ _?foo I.e. accept whatever in between DEFAULT and foo. r~