From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-71591-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 1047 invoked by alias); 11 May 2011 06:40:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 986 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2011 06:40:27 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_BD,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from vpn.id2.novell.com (HELO vpn.id2.novell.com) (195.33.99.129)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 06:40:13 +0000
Received: from EMEA1-MTA by vpn.id2.novell.com	with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 11 May 2011 07:40:11 +0100
Message-Id: <4DCA4B670200007800040E8A@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 06:40:00 -0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,	 "Quentin Neill" <quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com>
Cc: <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add bdver2 processor.
References: <BANLkTinEW3TWYHy04EGP-Cto-mOFErpWrg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimdze1=oXv6ZYhfJBF9oxz6rs7LCQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinukDoLD-yJ6SyfDbAjLO=NvHiN2w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinNnuhwjwp_0+FubD4=wzSixt6XvA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTin=2GZV86x7xSKQGFyQyryD2ED=tw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimwWnxZu+NCoGaUL2Z53ptEsK-S2g@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinkb8=QQ2mApx9CweRw5eaGNY28kw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinVmyo9kE6780FEz_2Fog2=RmR+yw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinVmyo9kE6780FEz_2Fog2=RmR+yw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00130.txt.bz2

>>> On 10.05.11 at 21:10, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Quentin Neill
>> Should I rename the PROCESSOR_BDVER1 variable to perhaps PROCESSOR_BDVER?
>=20
> Sounds good to me.

And in a couple of years from now nobody will be able to tell what the
"VER" in the name stands for ...

Jan