Re: ld's targets vs emulations (intending to link EFI binaries on Linux)

[Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>]

Hi Jan,

> Anyway, while for i386 to build a linker that can build both ELF
> and full-featured PE, all it takes is an extra configure option
> (--enable-target=i386-pe or some such), for x86-64 to be able
> to do the same one needs to first introduce such a bfd and
> linker target. Would a change like the below be acceptable for
> mainline?
>
> --- binutils-2.21/bfd/config.bfd
> +++ 2.21/bfd/config.bfd
> @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ case "${targ}" in
>       targ_selvecs="bfd_elf32_i386_vec i386linux_vec i386pei_vec x86_64pei_vec bfd_elf64_l1om_vec"
>       want64=true
>       ;;
> -  x86_64-*-mingw*)
> +  x86_64-*-mingw* | x86_64-*-pe | x86_64-*-pep )
>       targ_defvec=x86_64pe_vec
>       targ_selvecs="x86_64pe_vec x86_64pei_vec bfd_elf64_x86_64_vec bfd_elf64_l1om_vec i386pe_vec i386pei_vec bfd_elf32_i386_vec"
>       want64=true
> --- binutils-2.21/ld/configure.tgt
> +++ 2.21/ld/configure.tgt
> @@ -274,6 +274,9 @@ i[3-7]86-*-cygwin*)	targ_emul=i386pe ;
>   			test "$targ" != "$host"&&  LIB_PATH='${tooldir}/lib/w32api' ;;
>   i[3-7]86-*-mingw32*)	targ_emul=i386pe ;
>   			targ_extra_ofiles="deffilep.o pe-dll.o" ;;
> +x86_64-*-pe | x86_64-*-pep) targ_emul=i386pep ;
> +			targ_extra_emuls=i386pe ;
> +			targ_extra_ofiles="deffilep.o pep-dll.o pe-dll.o" ;;
>   x86_64-*-mingw*)	targ_emul=i386pep ;
>   			targ_extra_emuls=i386pe
>   			targ_extra_ofiles="deffilep.o pep-dll.o pe-dll.o" ;;

This is OK,


> What the original question boils down to is whether i386 and x86_64
> Linux selections shouldn't default to enable PE emulations (and not
> just the respective BFD targets).

Hmm, well you are welcome to try it out, but I think that you will start 
to run into problems with the relocations.

Cheers
   Nick