From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21578 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2011 12:22:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 21562 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jun 2011 12:22:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:21:39 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5SCL7Kb016224 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:21:07 -0400 Received: from [10.36.6.67] (vpn1-6-67.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.6.67]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5SCL5CZ017105; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:21:06 -0400 Message-ID: <4E09C765.30605@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:22:00 -0000 From: Nick Clifton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tristan Gingold CC: Catherine Moore , binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: PING Re: [RFA] Linker script extension SECTION_FLAGS References: <4DD41EB0.6040300@codesourcery.com> <4DDC37D2.3030700@codesourcery.com> <4DED4E64.6080507@codesourcery.com> <4DEE2390.2030309@redhat.com> <4E025F3A.6020003@codesourcery.com> <4E09BCFF.2030208@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00348.txt.bz2 Hi Tristan, >> * You have not provided a patch for GOLD. I would like to keep the two linkers in sync, at least as far as features go. > > Should we really require that ? I think that this is asking too much. There are some interesting features in gold (such as ICF) > that aren't in ld; so they are already not in sync. OK, fair enough. Lets make it an optional request. It would be nice if linker scripts were compatible between the two linkers though... Cheers Nicjk