From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from einhorn-mail-out.in-berlin.de (einhorn.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.8]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7354A38582B1 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 13:08:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 7354A38582B1 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ubuntu.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ubuntu.com X-Envelope-From: doko@ubuntu.com Received: from authenticated.user (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by einhorn.in-berlin.de with ESMTPSA id 25ND7kTT1971871 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 23 Jun 2022 15:07:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4a62e7f8-08a2-6bf1-b1e6-6a834199dec9@ubuntu.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 15:07:46 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Subject: Re: Getting ready for the 2.39 branch/release Content-Language: en-US To: Nick Clifton , binutils@sourceware.org, YunQiang Su References: <7e2b1296-8038-84e6-ac04-69890ae71a6d@redhat.com> <69df0c2f-016d-96ed-b4c6-2537453cb3fa@ubuntu.com> <98f2210a-9115-1607-2828-fc9c7c4a1477@redhat.com> Cc: "debian-mips@lists.debian.org" From: Matthias Klose In-Reply-To: <98f2210a-9115-1607-2828-fc9c7c4a1477@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_ALL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binutils mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 13:08:50 -0000 On 23.06.22 12:07, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Matthias, > >> Debian and Ubuntu are using the current trunk for the releases in development. >> There's currently one issue that I'm aware of: >> >>    https://bugs.debian.org/1013244 > > Is there a corresponding binutils PR for this ? No, not yet. > Would the attached patch solve the problem ? did you want to set ac_default_ld_warn_rwx_segments in the second chunk? > If the need for an executable stack is restricted to the hard-float ABI, > is there a way to determine this from the target configuration triplet ? > > Is there an explanation somewhere of why the hard-float ABI needs an > executable stack - and possibly how this need might be removed ? I had asked a mips porter, no reply yet. Matthias